Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710920›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the primary spinal cord tumors in routine clinical setting.

Young Il Won, Yunhee Choi, Woon Tak Yuh, Shin Won Kwon, Chi Heon Kim, Seung Heon Yang, Chun Kee Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Intraspinal extradural tumors].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Young Il WonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yunhee ChoiDivision of Medical Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woon Tak YuhDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shin Won KwonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chi Heon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Heon YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chun Kee ChungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. chungc@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI is the primary diagnostic modality for spinal cord tumors. However, its validity has never been vigorously scrutinized in daily routine clinical practice, where MRI tissue diagnosis is usually not a single one but multiple ones with several differential diagnoses. Here, we aimed to assess the validity of MRI in terms of predicting the pathology and location of the tumor in routine clinical settings. We analyzed 820 patients with primary spinal cord tumors, who have a pathological diagnosis and location in the operation record which were confirmed. We modified traditional measures for validity based upon a set of diagnoses instead of a single diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative predictabilities were evaluated for the tumor location and pathology. For tumor location, 456 were intradural extramedullary; 165 were intramedullary, and 156 were extradural. The overall sensitivity and specificity were over 90.0%. However, the sensitivity became lower when the tumor resided simultaneously in two spaces such as in the intradural-and-extradural or intramedullary-and-extramedullary space (54.6% and 30.0%, respectively). Most common pathology was schwannoma (n = 416), followed by meningioma (114) and ependymoma (87). Sensitivities were 93.3%, 90.4%, and 89.7%, respectively. Specificities were 70.8%, 82.9%, and 76.0%. In rare tumors such as neurofibromas, and diffuse midline gliomas, the sensitivity was much lower (less than 30%). For common locations and pathologies, the validity of MRI is generally acceptable. However, for rare locations and pathologies, MRI diagnosis still needs some improvement.

Indexed as

EpendymomaMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaSpinal Cord NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID35710920
PMCPMC9203586
OpenAlexW4283023774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.