ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2022
Within-participant statistics for cognitive science.
Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-supervised learning yields representational signatures of category-selective cortex.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Mind captioning: Evolving descriptive text of mental content from human brain activity.Science advances · 2025Article
- Individual differences do not mask effects of unconscious processing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- In silico discovery of representational relationships across visual cortex.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Individual differences shape conceptual representation in the brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Aperiodic neural activity distinguishes between phasic and tonic REM sleep.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- Natural sounds can be reconstructed from human neuroimaging data using deep neural network representation.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- The brain computes dynamic facial movements for emotion categorization using a third pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Overlapping Cortical Substrate of Biomechanical Control and Subjective Agency.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoding the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Neural Response Similarity in Auditory Processing: A Multivariate Analysis Based on OPM-MEG.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Bayesian p-curve mixture models as a tool to dissociate effect size and effect prevalence.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- Top-down selection of visual working memory contents is supported by alpha-band phase-synchronized oscillatory networks.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Concurrent perception of competing predictions: A "split-stimulus effect".Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Literacy in nonspeaking autistic people.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024Article
- International Experience of Implementing Cognitive Remediation for People With Psychotic Disorders.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- Walking modulates visual detection performance according to stride cycle phase.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Strengthening of alpha synchronization is a neural correlate of cognitive transfer.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- The superior colliculus motor region does not respond to finger tapping movements in humans.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cultural facial expressions dynamically convey emotion category and intensity information.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental studies in cognitive science typically focus on the population average effect. An alternative is to test each individual participant and then quantify the proportion of the population that would show the effect: the prevalence, or participant replication probability. We argue that this approach has conceptual and practical advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.