Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710708›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2022

Addressing inequitable access to hospice care.

Catriona R Mayland, Sarah Mitchell, Kate Flemming, Lynn Tatnell, Lesley Roberts, John I MacArtney

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catriona R MaylandDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK C.R.Mayland@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1440-9953
Sarah MitchellDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-7860
Kate FlemmingDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Lynn TatnellPatient and Public Representative, Torbay, UK.
Lesley RobertsPatient and Public Representative, Stafford, UK.
John I MacArtneyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'Lancet Commission on the Value of Death' proposes radical change and challenges the very core of hospice service provision. Without action, inequalities in access to hospice care will continue to be amplified. The COVID-19 pandemic brought increased needs and demands in the community setting but also provided opportunities for new palliative partnerships and ways of working. Returning to the status quo should not be an option. Rather moving towards a shared vision and purpose, which has the person and their community network at its centre, enables hospices to have a pivotal role and bring about more equitable palliative care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Home careHospice care

Identifiers

PMID35710708
PMCPMC9411874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.