ArticleScientific reports2022
Label-free morphological sub-population cytometry for sensitive phenotypic screening of heterogenous neural disease model cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep-DPC: Deep learning-assisted label-free temporal imaging discovery of anti-fibrotic compounds by controlling cell morphology.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Label-free morphology-based phenotypic analysis of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy muscle cell models.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Enhanced Estimation of Cellular Protein Levels from Bright-Field Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Robotics-Driven Manufacturing of Cartilaginous Microtissues for Skeletal Tissue Engineering Applications.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Label-free image analysis has several advantages with respect to the development of drug screening platforms. However, the evaluation of drug-responsive cells based exclusively on morphological information is challenging, especially in cases of morphologically heterogeneous cells or a small subset of drug-responsive cells. We developed a novel label-free cell sub-population analysis method called "in silico FOCUS (in silico analysis of featured-objects concentrated by anomaly discrimination from unit space)" to enable robust phenotypic screening of morphologically heterogeneous spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) model cells. This method with the anomaly discrimination concept can sensitively evaluate drug-responsive cells as morphologically anomalous cells through in silico cytometric analysis. As this algorithm requires only morphological information of control cells for training, no labeling or drug administration experiments are needed. The responses of SBMA model cells to dihydrotestosterone revealed that in silico FOCUS can identify the characteristics of a small sub-population with drug-responsive phenotypes to facilitate robust drug response profiling. The phenotype classification model confirmed with high accuracy the SBMA-rescuing effect of pioglitazone using morphological information alone. In silico FOCUS enables the evaluation of delicate quality transitions in cells that are difficult to profile experimentally, including primary cells or cells with no known markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.