ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Automated Assessment of Resident Clinical Reasoning Documentation.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Improving Clinical Documentation with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Perspectives in health information management · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Development of a mobile application for wound severity detection and modern dressing selection.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Implementation of the Personalized Automated Reading Delivery System as a Component of Precision Medical Education: Prospective Crossover Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- See more, detect more: investigating colonic inspection techniques and polyp detection using machine learning.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Limitations of large language model-generated multiple-choice questions in ophthalmology.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Using AI to identify in-hospital falls: a comparative analysis with incident reports and manual chart review.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Are Psychiatry Faculty Prepared to Guide AI Use? A National Survey.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- AI Literacy Among Chinese Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Examination of Individual and Environmental Factors.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Virtual patients and standardized patients combined training is associated with improved clinical reasoning among medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Medical Students' Perception of Automated Note Feedback After Simulated Encounters.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Modern statistical techniques for cardiothoracic surgeons: Part 8-Bayesian analysis and beyond.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Medical Education: Navigating the Alignment Paradox.ATS scholar · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence based assessment of clinical reasoning documentation: an observational study of the impact of the clinical learning environment on resident documentation quality.BMC medical education · 2025Observational
- Large Language Model-Based Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Documentation in the Electronic Health Record Across Two Institutions: Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Writing: The Art of Slowing Down Thinking.Neurology. Education · 2024Article
- Teaching clinical reasoning: principles from the literature to help improve instruction from the classroom to the bedside.Korean journal of medical education · 2024Review
- TRainee Attributable & Automatable Care Evaluations in Real-time (TRACERs): A Scalable Approach for Linking Education to Patient Care.Perspectives on medical education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResidents receive infrequent feedback on their clinical reasoning (CR) documentation. While machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) have been used to assess CR documentation in standardized cases, no studies have described similar use in the clinical environment.
objectiveThe authors developed and validated using Kane's framework a ML model for automated assessment of CR documentation quality in residents' admission notes. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, MAIN MEASURES: Internal medicine residents' and subspecialty fellows' admission notes at one medical center from July 2014 to March 2020 were extracted from the electronic health record. Using a validated CR documentation rubric, the authors rated 414 notes for the ML development dataset. Notes were truncated to isolate the relevant portion; an NLP software (cTAKES) extracted disease/disorder named entities and human review generated CR terms. The final model had three input variables and classified notes as demonstrating low- or high-quality CR documentation. The ML model was applied to a retrospective dataset (9591 notes) for human validation and data analysis. Reliability between human and ML ratings was assessed on 205 of these notes with Cohen's kappa. CR documentation quality by post-graduate year (PGY) was evaluated by the Mantel-Haenszel test of trend. KEY
resultsThe top-performing logistic regression model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88, a positive predictive value of 0.68, and an accuracy of 0.79. Cohen's kappa was 0.67. Of the 9591 notes, 31.1% demonstrated high-quality CR documentation; quality increased from 27.0% (PGY1) to 31.0% (PGY2) to 39.0% (PGY3) (p < .001 for trend). Validity evidence was collected in each domain of Kane's framework (scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and implications).
conclusionsThe authors developed and validated a high-performing ML model that classifies CR documentation quality in resident admission notes in the clinical environment-a novel application of ML and NLP with many potential use cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.