ArticleScientific data2022
500 metagenome-assembled microbial genomes from 30 subtropical estuaries in South China.
Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phosphate deprivation restricts bacterial degradation of the marine polysaccharide fucoidan.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Metabolic Potential of Candidatus Saccharimonadia Including Rare Lineages in Activated Sludge.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Plastic-Microbial BioRemediation DB: A Curated Database for Multi-Omics Applications.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Metagenomes and 1,313 metagenome-assembled genomes from a northern Gulf of Mexico coastal time series.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Metabolic capacity is maintained despite shifts in microbial diversity in estuary sediments.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Metagenome sequencing and 107 microbial genomes from seamount sediments along the Yap and Mariana trenches.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Recovery of 1887 metagenome-assembled genomes from the South China Sea.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Machine learning and metagenomics identifies uncharacterized taxa inferred to drive biogeochemical cycles in a subtropical hypereutrophic estuary.ISME communications · 2024Article
- Metagenome sequencing and 103 microbial genomes from ballast water and sediments.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Mining of novel secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters from acid mine drainage.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Metagenomics Reveal Microbial Effects of Lotus Root-Fish Co-Culture on Nitrogen Cycling in Aquaculture Pond Sediments.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- 500 metagenome-assembled microbial genomes from 30 subtropical estuaries in South China.Scientific data · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a unique geographical transition zone, the estuary is considered as a model environment to decipher the diversity, functions and ecological processes of microbial communities, which play important roles in the global biogeochemical cycle. Here we used surface water metagenomic sequencing datasets to construct metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from 30 subtropical estuaries at a large scale along South China. In total, 500 dereplicated MAGs with completeness ≥ 50% and contamination ≤ 10% were obtained, among which more than one-thirds (n = 207 MAGs) have a completeness ≥ 70%. These MAGs are dominated by taxa assigned to the phylum Proteobacteria (n = 182 MAGs), Bacteroidota (n = 110) and Actinobacteriota (n = 104). These draft genomes can be used to study the diversity, phylogenetic history and metabolic potential of microbiota in the estuary, which should help improve our understanding of the structure and function of these microorganisms and how they evolved and adapted to extreme conditions in the estuarine ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.