Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710509›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

The effect of health literacy on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among community population in China: The moderating role of stress.

Huiqiao Zhang, Yue Li, Sihui Peng, Yue Jiang, Huihui Jin, Fan Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huiqiao ZhangDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yue LiDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Sihui PengDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China; Division of Medical Psychology and Behavior Science, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yue JiangDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Huihui JinDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China; Division of Medical Psychology and Behavior Science, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China; Jinan University-BioKangtai Vaccine Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. Electronic address: florencezh@yahoo.com.hk.
Jinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe public's hesitant attitude is a major subjective barrier in promoting vaccination against COVID-19 to build herd immunity. The current study aimed to address how individual factors such as health literacy and perceived stress affect people's vaccine hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccine, and to provide insights for tailoring vaccine-promotion strategies.

methodsWith structured questionnaires, an online survey was conducted to address the relationship between the health literacy, perceived stress, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among community population in mainland, China. Moderated analysis was conducted to test the effect of health literacy on vaccine hesitancy among people with different levels of perceived stress.

results560 responses were collected in total. 39.8% of the participants reported vaccine hesitancy, and this rate was higher among younger people and female. Moreover, people with higher level of health literacy showed reduced vaccine hesitancy, while this effect was only significant among those with low or moderate level of stress. For people with high level of stress, no significant effect of health literacy was found.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that increasing people's health literacy could lead to reduced vaccine hesitancy in community sample. However, this effect disappeared when the stress level was high, suggesting other promotion services may need to be developed to increase the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine. In conclusion, vaccine promotion strategies should be tailored for different populations, with taking account of individual's health literacy and perceived stress.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyVaccinesChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19Health literacyPerceived stressVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35710509
PMCPMC9174466
OpenAlexW4282830920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.