Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710449›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Implementation of patient-reported outcomes for symptom management in oncology practice through the SIMPRO research consortium: a protocol for a pragmatic type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation multi-center cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial.

Michael J Hassett, Sandra Wong, Raymond U Osarogiagbon, Jessica Bian, Don S Dizon, Hannah Hazard Jenkins, Hajime Uno, Christine Cronin, Deborah Schrag, SIMPRO Co-Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03850912 (SIMPRO Research Center), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03850912 nacompletednot on this map

SIMPRO Research Center: Integration and Implementation of PROs for Symptom Management in Oncology Practice

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2019 to 2025Enrolled42,808ConditionsOther Cancer, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Thoracic Cancer, Gynecologic CancerArmsStakeholder Survey (Control Period), Stakeholder Survey (Intervention Period), Qualitative Interview, SASS Questionnaire, eSyM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient and staff experiences with an EHR-Integrated Symptom Management Program (eSyM) in oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J HassettDana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. michael_hassett@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0754-3510
Sandra WongDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Raymond U OsarogiagbonBaptist Medical Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jessica BianMaine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.
Don S DizonLifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Hannah Hazard JenkinsWest Virginia University Cancer Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Hajime UnoDana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Christine CroninDana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Deborah SchragMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
SIMPRO Co-Investigators
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USBrown University · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USMaine Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SIMPRO Research Center: Integration and Implementation of PROs for Symptom Management in Oncology PracticeUM1CA233080 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI HASSETT, MICHAEL JAMES, OSAROGIAGBON, RAYMOND U · 2018 to 2023
$9.1M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health 1UM1CA233080-01NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA233080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany cancer patients experience high symptom burden. Healthcare in the USA is reactive, not proactive, and doctor-patient communication is often suboptimal. As a result, symptomatic patients may suffer between clinic visits. In research settings, systematic assessment of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs), coupled with clinical responses to severe symptoms, has eased this symptom burden, improved health-related quality of life, reduced acute care needs, and extended survival. Implementing ePRO-based symptom management programs in routine care is challenging. To study methods to overcome the implementation gap and improve symptom control for cancer patients, the National Cancer Institute created the Cancer-Moonshot funded Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium.

methodsSymptom Management IMplementation of Patient Reported Outcomes in Oncology (SIMPRO) is one of three research centers that make up the IMPACT Consortium. SIMPRO, a multi-disciplinary team of investigators from six US health systems, seeks to develop, test, and integrate an electronic symptom management program (eSyM) for medical oncology and surgery patients into the Epic electronic health record (EHR) system and associated patient portal. eSyM supports real-time symptom tracking for patients, automated clinician alerts for severe symptoms, and specialized reports to facilitate population management. To rigorously evaluate its impact, eSyM is deployed through a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial. The primary study outcome is the occurrence of an emergency department treat-and-release event within 30 days of starting chemotherapy or being discharged following surgery. Secondary outcomes include hospitalization rates, chemotherapy use (time to initiation and duration of therapy), and patient quality of life and satisfaction. As a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, facilitators and barriers to implementation are assessed throughout the project. DISCUSSION: Creating and deploying eSyM requires collaboration between dozens of staff across diverse health systems, dedicated engagement of patient advocates, and robust support from Epic. This trial will evaluate eSyM in routine care settings across academic and community-based healthcare systems serving patients in rural and metropolitan locations. This trial's pragmatic design will promote generalizable results about the uptake, acceptability, and impact of an EHR-integrated, ePRO-based symptom management program.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03850912 . Registered on February 22, 2019. Last updated on November 9, 2021.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeHumansMedical OncologyMulticenter Studies as TopicPalliative CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesChemotherapyElectronic health recordElectronic medical recordGastrointestinal cancersGynecologic cancersPatient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS)Patient-reported outcomes (PROs)Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®)Pragmatic clinical trial designSurgerySymptom managementThoracic cancers

Identifiers

PMID35710449
PMCPMC9202326
OpenAlexW4283022348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.