Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710400›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Investigating pharmacy students' therapeutic decision-making with respect to antimicrobial stewardship cases.

Ziad G Nasr, Diala Alhaj Moustafa, Sara Dahmani, Kyle J Wilby

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ziad G NasrCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. znasr@qu.edu.qa.
Diala Alhaj MoustafaCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Sara DahmaniCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Kyle J WilbyCollege of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Qatar University · QADalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) play a big role in minimizing antimicrobial resistance. Pharmacists are essential members of the health care team and in order for them to fulfill roles on ASP teams and become antimicrobial stewards, they must be prepared adequately by pharmacy schools prior to entry into actual practice. Although programming has been implemented into entry-to-practice programs worldwide, little is known about how students interpret antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) data and arrive at clinical decisions. We aimed to explore students' cognitive processes and determine how they formulate therapeutic decisions when presented with AMS cases.

methodsThis was a qualitative study conducted using a case study approach, in which a sample (n=20) of pharmacy students was recruited to interpret AMS cases. Semi-structured 1-on-1 interviews were arranged with each participant. A think-aloud procedure with verbal protocol analysis was adopted to determine students' decision-making processes. Thematic analysis was used to interpret themes from the interview data.

resultsTwo themes were interpreted from the data: students' focus and students' approach to case interpretation. Students' focus relates to external factors students consider when interpreting AMS case data and use to make and justify therapeutic decisions including patient-centered factors, drug-related factors, AMS interventions, and pharmacist's role. Students' clinical reasoning describes the approach that students use to interpret the data and the decision-making processes they employ to arrive at a clinical decision including a systematic approach versus non-systematic approach.

conclusionsStudents vary in their focus and the cognitive strategies used to interpret AMS cases. Findings support the notion that clinical reasoning and decision-making should be explicitly taught in pharmacy curricula, in order to help students become aware of their own cognitive processes and decision-making abilities.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipStudents, PharmacyHumansPharmacistsQualitative ResearchAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipClinical reasoningPharmacy educationQualitative researchThink-aloud

Identifiers

PMID35710400
PMCPMC9203133
OpenAlexW4283030180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.