Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710365›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2022

Effect of prone position in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study.

Ziying Chen, Min Li, Sichao Gu, Xu Huang, Jingen Xia, Qinghua Ye, Jiangnan Zheng, Qingyuan Zhan, Chen Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Severe respiratory syncytial virus disease.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ziying ChenPeking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, No. 2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Min LiCenter for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Sichao GuCenter for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xu HuangCenter for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jingen XiaCenter for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Qinghua YePeking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, No. 2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Jiangnan ZhengDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qingyuan ZhanPeking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, No. 2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China. drzhanqy@163.com.
Chen WangPeking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, No. 2 Yinghua East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of prone position (PP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is controversial.

objectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of application of PP during VV-ECMO in patients with ARDS.

methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study of patients who met the Berlin definition of ARDS, and were supported with VV-ECMO. We divided the patients into two groups. The prone group included patients who were supported by VV-ECMO, and experienced at least one period of PP, while those without PP during VV-ECMO were defined as the supine group. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:1 was introduced to minimize potential confounders. The primary outcomes were the complications of PP and the change of arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of the inspiration (PaO

resultsFrom April 2013 to October 2020, a total of 91 patients met the diagnostic criteria of ARDS who were supported with ECMO. 38 patients (41.8%) received at least one period of PP during ECMO, while 53 patients (58.2%) were maintained in supine position during ECMO. 22 minor complications were reported in the prone group and major complications were not found. The other ECMO-related complications were similar between two groups. The PaO

conclusionsPP during VV-ECMO was safe and could improve oxygenation. A large-scale and well-designed RCT is needed in the future.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiratory Distress SyndromeHumansPatient PositioningProne PositionRetrospective StudiesAcute respiratory distress syndromeProne positionVenovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID35710365
PMCPMC9202669
OpenAlexW4282961208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.