Observational studyBMC neurology2022
Real-world experience of erenumab in patients with chronic or episodic migraine in the UAE.
Observational study in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in the Prevention of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Cohort Studies.Clinical drug investigation · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Lidocaine Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma for Stellate Ganglion Block in Chronic Migraine: A Multicenter, Prospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Erenumab in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Chronic Migraine and Medication Overuse Headache.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2026Observational
- Prevalence, Treatment, and Unmet Needs of Migraine in the Middle East: A Systematic Review.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Combining treatments for migraine prophylaxis: the state-of-the-art.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies: Key Lessons from Real-World Evidence.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Exploring Erenumab's Efficacy and Safety for Migraine Prevention in Real-World Settings: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Use of CGRP-Based Therapies for Migraine Prevention in the UAE.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Eptinezumab in Episodic and Chronic Migraine Headache in the UAE: A Retrospective Study.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundErenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody and a highly potent, first-in-class calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor inhibitor approved for migraine prevention in adults. Randomised, placebo-controlled trials show that erenumab treatment results in clinically meaningful responses, including significant reductions in monthly migraine days. Real-world evidence of the effectiveness of erenumab in patients with migraine is accruing, but gaps remain, and findings may vary according to region. We evaluated the usage patterns and effectiveness of erenumab in real-world settings in patients with migraine in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
methodsThis retrospective, observational real-world study enrolled patients ≥ 18 years with migraine who were prescribed erenumab in the UAE. Data were collected at baseline and Months 1, 3 and 6. The primary study objective was to characterise usage patterns of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM) or episodic migraine (EM) in real-world settings in the UAE.
resultsOf the 166 patients, 124 (74.7%) were females. The mean (standard deviation) age at migraine onset was 29 (7.93) years. Seventy-one patients (42.8%) had CM and 95 (57.2%) had EM. In the overall population, the mean monthly headache/migraine days (MHD) at baseline was 15.7 (8.45) and mean change from baseline was - 8.2 (8.83) at Month 1, - 11.0 (9.15) at Month 3 and - 11.3 (8.90) at Month 6. The mean change from baseline in monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD) was - 9.0 (8.07) at Month 1, - 9.7 (8.73) at Month 3 and - 10.7 (8.95) at Month 6. At all time points, most patients achieved at least 50% reduction in MHD (80%-91%) and MSMD (84%-94%). Similar reductions in MHD and MSMD and clinical benefit in CM or EM were seen with erenumab monotherapy or erenumab add-on therapy, with or without dose escalation and for treatment naïve or ≥ 1 previous preventive treatment failures, with additional clinical benefit in the erenumab add-on therapy and dose escalation to 140 mg subgroups.
conclusionIn this real-world study on erenumab use in the UAE, patients prescribed erenumab achieved clinically meaningful reductions in MHD and MSMD at all assessed time points. Erenumab was well tolerated with no new safety events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.