Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710339›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2022

Automated versus conventional perioperative glycemic control in adult diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgery.

Roland Kaddoum, Amro Khalili, Fadia M Shebbo, Nathalie Ghanem, Layal Abou Daher, Arwa Bou Ali, Nour El Hage Chehade, Patrick Maroun, Marie T Aouad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03314272 (Automated Versus Conventional Perioperative Glycemic Control in Adult Diabetic Patients Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03314272 nacompletednot on this map

Automated Versus Conventional Perioperative Glycemic Control in Adult Diabetic Patients Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterRan2018 to 2021Enrolled59ConditionsDiabetes, Cardiopulmonary BypassArmsSpace Glucose Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roland Kaddoum *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Amro Khalili *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fadia M ShebboDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nathalie GhanemDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Layal Abou DaherDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Arwa Bou AliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nour El Hage ChehadeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Patrick MarounFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Marie T AouadDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. mm01@aub.edu.lb.
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBAmerican University of Beirut · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative glycemic variability is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity and an increased incidence of hyperglycemia after cardiac surgery. Accordingly, clinicians tend to use a tight glucose control to maintain perioperative blood glucose levels and therefore the need to develop a less laborious automated glucose control system is important especially in diabetic patients at a higher risk of developing complications.

methodsPatients, aged between 40 and 75 years old, undergoing open heart surgery were randomized to either an automated protocol (experimental) or to the conventional technique at our institution (control).

resultsWe showed that the percentage of patients maintained between 7.8-10 mmol.l

conclusionWe concluded that the automated glucose control pump in diabetic patients undergoing open heart surgeries maintained most of the patients within a predefined glucose range with a very low incidence of hyperglycemic events and no incidence of hypoglycemic events.

trial registrationRegistered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT # NCT03314272 , Principal investigator Roland Kaddoum, date of registration: 19/10/2017).

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresDiabetes MellitusAdultAgedBlood GlucoseGlucoseGlycemic ControlHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinCardiac surgical proceduresGlycemic controlHypoglycemiaInsulins

Identifiers

PMID35710339
PMCPMC9202201
OpenAlexW4282971995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.