Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710320›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2022

Plasma neurofilament light chain levels suggest neuroaxonal stability following therapeutic remyelination in people with multiple sclerosis.

Ahmed Abdelhak, Christian Cordano, W John Boscardin, Eduardo Caverzasi, Jens Kuhle, Brandon Chan, Jeffrey M Gelfand, Hao H Yiu, Frederike C Oertel, Alexandra Beaudry-Richard and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02040298 (A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo Controlled Crossover Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Clemastine Fumarate as a Remyelinating Agent in Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02040298 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo Controlled Crossover Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Clemastine Fumarate as a Remyelinating Agent in Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2014 to 2016Enrolled50ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsClemastine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Remyelination therapies are achievable in clinical practice-Yes.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Spironolactone Targets Retinoid X Receptor γ to Promote Myelin Sheath Regeneration.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Remyelination protects neurons from DLK-mediated neurodegeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Pipe dream: Remyelination therapy for multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed AbdelhakWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9731-4169
Christian CordanoWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
W John BoscardinDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Eduardo CaverzasiWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0350-0460
Jens KuhleMultiple Sclerosis Centre, Neurology, Departments of Head, Spine and Neuromedicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Brandon ChanWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Jeffrey M GelfandWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5121-3319
Hao H YiuDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Frederike C OertelWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Alexandra Beaudry-RichardWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Shivany Condor MontesWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Jorge R OksenbergWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Argentina Lario LagoWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Adam BoxerWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Julio C Rojas-MartinezWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Fanny M ElahiWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Jonah R ChanWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Ari J GreenWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA agreen@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

The Role of B cells in the Origin and Progression of Multiple SclerosisR35NS111644 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEPHEN L HAUSER · 2019 to 2026
$9.1M
Proteomics for fluid biomarker discovery in frontotemporal dementiaK23AG059888 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROJAS-MARTINEZ, JULIO CESAR · 2019 to 2023
$995k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG059888NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS111644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic demyelination is a major contributor to axonal vulnerability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, remyelination could provide a potent neuroprotective strategy. The ReBUILD trial was the first study showing evidence for successful remyelination following treatment with clemastine in people with MS (pwMS) with no evidence of disease activity or progression (NEDAP). Whether remyelination was associated with neuroprotection remains unexplored.

methodsPlasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels were measured from ReBUILD trial's participants. Mixed linear effect models were fit for individual patients, epoch and longitudinal measurements to compare NfL concentrations between samples collected during the active and placebo treatment period.

resultsNfL concentrations were 9.6% lower in samples collected during the active treatment with clemastine (n=53, geometric mean=6.33 pg/mL) compared to samples collected during treatment with placebo (n=73, 7.00 pg/mL) (B=-0.035 [-0.068 to -0.001], p=0.041). Applying age- and body mass index-standardised NfL Z-scores and percentiles revealed similar results (0.04 vs 0.35, and 27.5 vs 33.3, p=0.023 and 0.042, respectively). Higher NfL concentrations were associated with more delayed P100 latencies (B=1.33 [0.26 to 2.41], p=0.015). In addition, improvement of P100 latencies between visits was associated with a trend for lower NfL values (B=0.003 [-0.0004 to 0.007], p=0.081). Based on a Cohen's d of 0.248, a future 1:1 parallel-arm placebo-controlled study using a remyelinating agent with comparable effect as clemastine would need 202 subjects per group to achieve 80% power.

conclusionsIn pwMS, treatment with the remyelinating agent clemastine was associated with a reduction of blood NfL, suggesting that neuroprotection is achievable and measurable with therapeutic remyelination. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02040298.

Indexed as

MULTIPLE SCLEROSISNEUROBIOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID35710320
PMCPMC9984688
OpenAlexW4282961587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.