Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710254›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Digital intervention promoting physical activity among obese people (DIPPAO) randomised controlled trial: study protocol.

Alexandre Mazéas, Aïna Chalabaev, Marine Blond, Bruno Pereira, Martine Duclos

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04887077 (Digital Intervention Promoting Physical Activity Among Obese People Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04887077 nacompletednot on this map

Digital Intervention Promoting Physical Activity Among Obese People Randomized Controlled Trial: Assessing the Effects of a Digital Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Patients With Obesity and/or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2021 to 2023Enrolled56ConditionsObesity, Diabete Type 2ArmsKiplin, face-to-face
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandre MazéasSENS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France alexandre.mazeas@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0255-6032
Aïna ChalabaevSENS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Marine BlondKiplin, Nantes, France.
Bruno PereiraDepartment of Biostatistics Unit (DRCI), University Hospital Centre, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Martine DuclosDepartment of Human Nutrition, INRAE Centre Clermont-Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhysical inactivity and excessive sedentary behaviours are major preventable causes in both the development and the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Nevertheless, current programmes struggle to engage and sustain physical activity (PA) of patients over long periods of time. To overcome these limitations, the Digital Intervention Promoting Physical Activity among Obese people randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based digital intervention grounded on gamification strategies, enhanced by social features and informed by the tenets of the self-determination theory and the social identity approach. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial is a two-arm parallel RCT testing the effectiveness of the Kiplin digital intervention on obese and patients with T2DM in comparison to the usual supervised PA programme of the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France. A total of 50 patients will be randomised to one of the two interventions and will follow a 3-month programme with a 6-month follow-up postintervention. The primary outcome of the study is the daily step count change between the baseline assessment and the end of the intervention. Accelerometer data, self-reported PA, body composition and physical capacities will also be evaluated. To advance our understanding of complex interventions like gamified and group-based ones, we will explore several psychological mediators relative to motivation, enjoyment, in-group identification or perceived weight stigma. Finally, to assess a potential superior economic efficiency compared with the current treatment, we will conduct a cost-utility analysis between the two conditions. A mixed-model approach will be used to analyse the change in outcomes over time. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Local Human Protection Committee (CPP Ile de France XI, No 21 004-65219). Results will inform the Kiplin app development, be published in scientific journals and disseminated in international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04887077.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSedentary Behaviorbehavior changecost-utilitye-healthgamificationinterventionmhealthmobile appobesityphysical activityRCTT2DMweight stigma

Identifiers

PMID35710254
PMCPMC9204413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.