Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710136›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reviews2022

New Technologies Bloom Together for Bettering Cancer Drug Conjugates.

Yiming Jin, Shahab Edalatian Zakeri, Raman Bahal, Andrew J Wiemer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. DNA-directed assembly of multivalent lipid nanoparticles for targeted T cell gene delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Tumor-Targeted Delivery Therapy Based on PLGA Nanoparticles.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Antibody-Drug Conjugates-Evolution and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yiming JinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Shahab Edalatian ZakeriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Raman BahalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Andrew J WiemerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut andrew.wiemer@uconn.edu.

Funding

Role of immune modulating butyrophilins in gamma delta T cell activationR01AI150869 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI VINOGRADOVA, OLGA, WIEMER, ANDREW J · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Targeting microRNAs in the tumor microenvironment with pHLIP conjugated next generation chemically modified PNAsR01CA241194 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLACK, FRANK J. · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241194NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug conjugates, including antibody-drug conjugates, are a step toward realizing Paul Ehrlich's idea from over 100 years ago of a "magic bullet" for cancer treatment. Through balancing selective targeting molecules with highly potent payloads, drug conjugates can target specific tumor microenvironments and kill tumor cells. A drug conjugate consists of three parts: a targeting agent, a linker, and a payload. In some conjugates, monoclonal antibodies act as the targeting agent, but new strategies for targeting include antibody derivatives, peptides, and even small molecules. Linkers are responsible for connecting the payload to the targeting agent. Payloads impact vital cellular processes to kill tumor cells. At present, there are 12 antibody-drug conjugates on the market for different types of cancers. Research on drug conjugates is increasing year by year to solve problems encountered in conjugate design, such as tumor heterogeneity, poor circulation, low drug loading, low tumor uptake, and heterogenous expression of target antigens. This review highlights some important preclinical research on drug conjugates in recent years. We focus on three significant areas: improvement of antibody-drug conjugates, identification of new conjugate targets, and development of new types of drug conjugates, including nanotechnology. We close by highlighting the critical barriers to clinical translation and the open questions going forward. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The development of anticancer drug conjugates is now focused in three broad areas: improvements to existing antibody drug conjugates, identification of new targets, and development of new conjugate forms. This article focuses on the exciting preclinical studies in these three areas and advances in the technology that improves preclinical development.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesNeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansTumor MicroenvironmentAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID35710136
PMCPMC9553120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.