Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710124›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Guided, internet based, cognitive behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (RAPID).

Jonathan I Bisson, Cono Ariti, Katherine Cullen, Neil Kitchiner, Catrin Lewis, Neil P Roberts, Natalie Simon, Kim Smallman, Katy Addison, Vicky Bell and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan I BissonDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK bissonji@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5170-1243
Cono AritiCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Katherine CullenSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Neil KitchinerDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Catrin LewisDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Neil P RobertsDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Natalie SimonDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Kim SmallmanCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Katy AddisonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Vicky BellDivision of Nursing, Midwifery, and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Lucy Brookes-HowellCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Sarah CosgroveDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Anke EhlersUniversity of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Deborah FitzsimmonsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Paula Foscarini-CraggsCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Shaun R S HarrisSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Mark KelsonDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Karina LovellDivision of Nursing, Midwifery, and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Maureen McKennaNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Rachel McNamaraCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Claire NollettCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Tim PicklesCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rhys Williams-ThomasCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Cardiff University · GBSwansea University · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBNHS Lothian · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 200796/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if guided internet based cognitive behavioural therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) is non-inferior to individual face-to-face CBT-TF for mild to moderate post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to one traumatic event.

designPragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (RAPID).

settingPrimary and secondary mental health settings across the UK's NHS.

participants196 adults with a primary diagnosis of mild to moderate PTSD were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to one of two interventions, with 82% retention at 16 weeks and 71% retention at 52 weeks. 19 participants and 10 therapists were purposively sampled and interviewed for evaluation of the process.

interventionsUp to 12 face-to-face, manual based, individual CBT-TF sessions, each lasting 60-90 minutes; or guided internet based CBT-TF with an eight step online programme, with up to three hours of contact with a therapist and four brief telephone calls or email contacts between sessions.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) at 16 weeks after randomisation (diagnosis of PTSD based on the criteria of the

resultsNon-inferiority was found at the primary endpoint of 16 weeks on the CAPS-5 (mean difference 1.01, one sided 95% confidence interval -∞ to 3.90, non-inferiority P=0.012). Improvements in CAPS-5 score of more than 60% in the two groups were maintained at 52 weeks, but the non-inferiority results were inconclusive in favour of face-to-face CBT-TF at this time point (3.20, -∞ to 6.00, P=0.15). Guided internet based CBT-TF was significantly (P<0.001) cheaper than face-to-face CBT-TF and seemed to be acceptable and well tolerated by participants. The main themes of the qualitative analysis were facilitators and barriers to engagement with guided internet based CBT-TF, treatment outcomes, and considerations for its future implementation.

conclusionsGuided internet based CBT-TF for mild to moderate PTSD to one traumatic event was non-inferior to individual face-to-face CBT-TF and should be considered a first line treatment for people with this condition.

trial registrationISRCTN13697710.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansInternetTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35710124
PMCPMC9202033
OpenAlexW4283029326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.