Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35709963›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2022

Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: Results from the EUCLID online survey.

Julia E Koller, Karoline Villinger, Nadine C Lages, Pilvikki Absetz, Melanie Bamert, Cátia Branquinho, Lourdes Chaves-Avilés, Panagiota Dimitropoulou, Ana Lucía Fernández-Fernández, Margarida Gaspar de Matos and 15 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Julia E KollerPsychological Assessment and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany. Electronic address: julia.koller@uni-konstanz.de.
Karoline VillingerPsychological Assessment and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Applied Social and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Nadine C LagesPsychological Assessment and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany.
Pilvikki AbsetzFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland.
Melanie BamertDepartment of Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Cátia BranquinhoInstitute of Environmental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Lourdes Chaves-AvilésUniversidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED), Central Pacific Office (Parrita-Quepos), Costa Rica.
Panagiota DimitropoulouDepartment of Psychology, Rethymno, University of Crete, Greece.
Ana Lucía Fernández-FernándezGender Studies Institute, Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED), San José, Costa Rica.
Margarida Gaspar de MatosInstitute of Environmental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Inguna GriskevicaDepartment of Health Psychology and Pedagogy, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Benicio Gutiérrez-DoñaResearch Vice-Rectory, Research Program in Psychological/Behavioral Sciences, Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED), San José, Costa Rica.
Nelli HankonenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland.
Jennifer InauenDepartment of Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Dimitrinka Jordanova PeshevskaDepartment of Psychology, University American College Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Angelos P KassianosDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCL, London, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Cyprus.
Jelena KolsenikovaDepartment of Health Psychology and Pedagogy, Psychology laboratory, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Meta LavričSlovene Centre for Suicide Research, Andrej Marušič Institute, University of Primorska, Slovenia; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Slovenia.
Tamara MitanovskaNeurovita - Center for Neuropsychology and Cognitive Psychology, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Efrat NeterBehavioral Sciences Department, Ruppin Academic Center, Israel.
Vita PoštuvanSlovene Centre for Suicide Research, Andrej Marušič Institute, University of Primorska, Slovenia; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Slovenia.
Ingrida Trups-KalnePsychology laboratory, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Jorge Vargas-CarmiolMedicine School, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Harald T SchuppGeneral and Biological Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Germany.
Britta RennerPsychological Assessment and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn times of unprecedented infectious disease threats, it is essential to understand how to increase individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures. The present study therefore examines factors associated with individual and collective pathways.

methodsData was collected through an online survey from 4483 participants (70.8% female, M = 41.2 years) across 10 countries from April 15, 2020 to June 2, 2020 as part of the "EUCLID" project (https://euclid.dbvis.de). Structural equation modeling was used to examine individual and collective pathways across and within countries.

resultsOverall, the adoption of individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures were high. Risk perception on the individual level and perceived effectiveness at the collective level were positively associated with both individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures. Furthermore, the model explained considerable variance in individual (40.7%) and collective protective behaviors (40.8%) and was largely replicated across countries.

conclusionsThe study extends previous research by demonstrating that individual risk perception and perceived effectiveness of collective measures jointly affect individual protective health behaviors and support for collective measures. These findings highlight the need to jointly consider a variety of behavioral actions against infectious disease threats, acknowledging interactions between individual and collective pathways.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMalePandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesCollective measuresCross-amplificationCross-country differencesProtective behaviorRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID35709963
PMCPMC9190179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.