ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2022
Efficient Quantification of Lipid Packing Defect Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides: Comparing Martini 2 and 3 with CHARMM36.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening of amphipathic helices identifies features linked to inner nuclear membrane properties.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Computational Characterization of the Role of LEM2/LaminA Interactions on the Stability of BAF-Dimer Using Molecular Simulations.Proteins · 2026Article
- The Effect of Aza-Glycine Substitution on the Internalization of Dabcyl-Containing Short Oligoarginine.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Identification and Characterization of an In Silico Designed Membrane-Active Peptide with Antiviral Properties.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Automated parametrization of small molecules within the Martini 3 coarse-grained model guided by experimental log P values.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- GōMartini 3: From large conformational changes in proteins to environmental bias corrections.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Unlocking the specificity of antimicrobial peptide interactions for membrane-targeted therapies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Exploring the Properties of Curved Lipid Membranes: Comparative Analysis of Atomistic and Coarse-Grained Force Fields.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Mfn2-dependent fusion pathway of PE-enriched micron-sized vesicles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Analyzing Lipid Membrane Defects via a Coarse-Grained to Triangulated Surface Map: The Role of Lipid Order and Local Curvature in Molecular Binding.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- When Data Are Lacking: Physics-Based Inverse Design of Biopolymers Interacting with Complex, Fluid Phases.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Review
- PMIpred: a physics-informed web server for quantitative protein-membrane interaction prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Physics-based generative model of curvature sensing peptides; distinguishing sensors from binders.Science advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In biological systems, proteins can be attracted to curved or stretched regions of lipid bilayers by sensing hydrophobic defects in the lipid packing on the membrane surface. Here, we present an efficient end-state free energy calculation method to quantify such sensing in molecular dynamics simulations. We illustrate that lipid packing defect sensing can be defined as the difference in mechanical work required to stretch a membrane with and without a peptide bound to the surface. We also demonstrate that a peptide's ability to concurrently induce excess leaflet area (tension) and elastic softening─a property we call the "characteristic area of sensing" (CHAOS)─and lipid packing sensing behavior are in fact two sides of the same coin. In essence, defect sensing displays a peptide's propensity to generate tension. The here-proposed mechanical pathway is equally accurate yet, computationally, about 40 times less costly than the commonly used alchemical pathway (thermodynamic integration), allowing for more feasible free energy calculations in atomistic simulations. This enabled us to directly compare the Martini 2 and 3 coarse-grained and the CHARMM36 atomistic force fields in terms of relative binding free energies for six representative peptides including the curvature sensor ALPS and two antiviral amphipathic helices (AH). We observed that Martini 3 qualitatively reproduces experimental trends while producing substantially lower (relative) binding free energies and shallower membrane insertion depths compared to atomistic simulations. In contrast, Martini 2 tends to overestimate (relative) binding free energies. Finally, we offer a glimpse into how our end-state-based free energy method can enable the inverse design of optimal lipid packing defect sensing peptides when used in conjunction with our recently developed evolutionary molecular dynamics (Evo-MD) method. We argue that these optimized defect sensors─aside from their biomedical and biophysical relevance─can provide valuable targets for the development of lipid force fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.