Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708975›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2023

Validation of the Italian version of the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire (HQ-25-I).

Emanuele Fino, Paolo Iliceto, Antonino Carcione, Eleni Giovani, Gabriella Candilera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the 25-Item Hikikomori Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emanuele FinoNTU Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5095-6014
Paolo IlicetoS&P Statistics and Psychometrics Ltd, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6572-0768
Antonino CarcioneThird Centre of Cognitive Psychotherapy, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0176-266X
Eleni GiovaniPrivate Practice, Rome, Italy.
Gabriella CandileraS&P Statistics and Psychometrics Ltd, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4618-105X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe present study aimed to adapt the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire to the Italian context (HQ-25-I) and to test its psychometric properties in two samples, particularly a sample of residents with psychiatric conditions (n = 117) and a sample of individuals from the community (n = 209).

methodsWe tested the fit of the original three-factor structure (Socialization, Isolation, and Emotional Support) and measurement invariance across the two groups, and the reliability, convergent, and criterion (concurrent) validity of the HQ-25-I.

resultsThe results showed that the original measurement model fitted the data well and that it was invariant across the two groups. The measure was reliable and positively correlated with some maladaptive personality trait domains (PID-5-BF), Depression (BDI-II), and Hopelessness (BHS) in both groups, with higher scores observed in the clinical sample. However, low correlations were found between the HQ-25-I and the PID-5-BF Detachment and Negative Affectivity.

conclusionsThe results from the study showed that the HQ-25-I is reliable, but further examination of its validity is warranted. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.

Indexed as

Phobia, SocialHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsShameSurveys and Questionnairesdepressionemotional supportHikikomoriisolationsocialization

Identifiers

PMID35708975
PMCPMC10083961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.