Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708886›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Effectiveness of Adult Health Promotion Interventions Delivered Through Professional Sport: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Emma S George, Aymen El Masri, Dominika Kwasnicka, Alannah Romeo, Sarah Cavallin, Andrew Bennie, Gregory S Kolt, Justin M Guagliano

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma S GeorgeSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. e.george@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-1911
Aymen El MasriSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2691-6135
Dominika KwasnickaSWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5961-837X
Alannah RomeoSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-0308
Sarah CavallinSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-114X
Andrew BennieSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9151-4821
Gregory S KoltSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-3324
Justin M GuaglianoSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-5700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers are capitalising on the strong connections that sport fans have with their teams for health promotion programmes, yet no existing systematic reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of interventions delivered through professional sport.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to systematically collate, evaluate, and synthesise the evidence on health promotion interventions implemented in professional sport settings.

methodsRandomised controlled trials reporting on adult health promotion initiatives delivered in professional sport settings were identified through electronic database searches in CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar. Data on health-related outcomes (e.g., weight, physical activity, dietary intake) were extracted and synthesised, and random effects meta-analyses were conducted to examine effects for weight and waist circumference. Risk of bias was examined using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised controlled trials (RoB 2).

resultsSix studies reporting on five unique interventions met the inclusion criteria, and all included studies were gender-sensitised and exclusively targeted men. Intervention effects were observed for several health outcomes, including physical activity, dietary intake, and psychosocial health. All studies aimed to reduce weight, and for most studies (n = 4), weight was a primary outcome, either of the included study or to inform a future definitive trial. Findings from the meta-analysis revealed an overall significant difference in change in weight of - 3.2 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] - 4.6 to - 1.8) and waist circumference of - 3.9 cm (95% CI - 4.9 to - 2.8), both in favour of the intervention group at 12 weeks. Intervention effects were also reported for several other health outcomes (e.g., physical activity, dietary intake, psychosocial health); however, they were not consistently measured across the studies and thus were not meta-analysed.

conclusionHealth promotion interventions delivered through professional sporting organisations can significantly improve weight- and lifestyle-related health outcomes. Representation across the socioeconomic spectrum and across culturally and linguistically diverse groups was limited. As only a limited number of studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, a need exists for rigorously designed interventions, standardised intervention approaches, with long-term follow-up, and the potential for scalability. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019123295.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSportsAdultEatingExerciseHumansLife StyleMale

Identifiers

PMID35708886
PMCPMC9585012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.