Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708760›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Vaccine Adverse Event Mining of Twitter Conversations: 2-Phase Classification Study.

Sedigheh Khademi Habibabadi, Pari Delir Haghighi, Frada Burstein, Jim Buttery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Information systems for vaccine safety surveillance.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sedigheh Khademi Habibabadi *Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6146-1415
Pari Delir Haghighi *Department of Human-Centred Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9922-1214
Frada BursteinDepartment of Human-Centred Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8258-0878
Jim Buttery *Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-2035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional monitoring for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) relies on various established reporting systems, where there is inevitable lag between an AEFI occurring and its potential reporting and subsequent processing of reports. AEFI safety signal detection strives to detect AEFI as early as possible, ideally close to real time. Monitoring social media data holds promise as a resource for this.

objectiveThe primary aim of this study is to investigate the utility of monitoring social media for gaining early insights into vaccine safety issues, by extracting vaccine adverse event mentions (VAEMs) from Twitter, using natural language processing techniques. The secondary aims are to document the natural language processing techniques used and identify the most effective of them for identifying tweets that contain VAEM, with a view to define an approach that might be applicable to other similar social media surveillance tasks.

methodsA VAEM-Mine method was developed that combines topic modeling with classification techniques to extract maximal VAEM posts from a vaccine-related Twitter stream, with high degree of confidence. The approach does not require a targeted search for specific vaccine reaction-indicative words, but instead, identifies VAEM posts according to their language structure.

resultsThe VAEM-Mine method isolated 8992 VAEMs from 811,010 vaccine-related Twitter posts and achieved an F

conclusionsSocial media can assist with the detection of vaccine safety signals as a valuable complementary source for monitoring mentions of vaccine adverse events. A social media-based VAEM data stream can be assessed for changes to detect possible emerging vaccine safety signals, helping to address the well-recognized limitations of passive reporting systems, including lack of timeliness and underreporting.

Indexed as

immunizationmachine learningnatural language processingsocial mediaTwittervaccine adverse effectsvaccinesvaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID35708760
PMCPMC9247809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.