ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2022
Impact of COVID-19 on ambulatory blood pressure in young adults: a cross-sectional analysis investigating time since diagnosis.
Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing a Pulmonary Telerehabilitation Program for Young Adults with Post-COVID-19 Conditions: A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of blood pressure variation in recovered COVID-19 patients at one-year follow-up: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Elevated Arterial Blood Pressure as a Delayed Complication Following COVID-19-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Trajectories of functional and structural myocardial parameters in post-COVID-19 syndrome-insights from mid-term follow-up by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular and cerebral vascular health in females with postacute sequelae of COVID-19.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Article
- Closing the window on COVID-19 case-control studies.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Article
- Counter-regulatory renin-angiotensin system in hypertension: Review and update in the era of COVID-19 pandemic.Biochemical pharmacology · 2023Review
- Distinct Features of Vascular Diseases in COVID-19.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Review
- Long-term cardiovascular health status and physical functioning of nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 compared with non-COVID-19 controls.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Article
- Investigating autonomic nervous system dysfunction among patients with post-COVID condition and prolonged cardiovascular symptoms.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on cardiac autonomic function in healthy young adults: potential role of symptomatology and time since diagnosis.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Article
- COVID-19 controls causing a kerfuffle.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have reported detrimental effects of COVID-19 on the peripheral vasculature. However, reports on blood pressure (BP) are inconsistent, and measurements are made only in the laboratory setting. To date, no studies have measured ambulatory BP. In addition, in previous studies, time since COVID-19 diagnosis among participants varied across a wide range, potentially contributing to the inconsistent BP results. Thus, we aimed to perform a comprehensive assessment of BP and BP variability using ambulatory and laboratory (brachial and central) measurements in young adults who had COVID-19. We hypothesized that ambulatory BP would be elevated post-COVID-19 and that measures of BP would be inversely related with time since diagnosis. Twenty-eight young adults who had COVID-19 [11 ± 6 (range 3-22) wk since diagnosis] and 10 controls were studied. Ambulatory daytime, nighttime, and 24-h systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean BP were not different between the control and COVID groups (e.g., daytime systolic BP: control, 122 ± 12 mmHg; COVID, 122 ± 10 mmHg;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.