Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708686›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Predict the Occurrence and Severity of Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Qiaowei Wu, Yijun Hu, Zhenyao Mo, Rong Wu, Xiayin Zhang, Yahan Yang, Baoyi Liu, Yu Xiao, Xiaomin Zeng, Zhanjie Lin and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantifying Sagittal Craniosynostosis Severity: A Machine Learning Approach With CranioRate.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  5. AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Qiaowei WuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yijun HuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenyao MoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Cyberspace Information, School of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Rong WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiayin ZhangGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yahan YangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Baoyi LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu XiaoGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaomin ZengGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhanjie LinGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Ying FangGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yijin WangDepartment of Neonatology, Second Nanning People's Hospital, Nanning, China.
Xiaohe LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanping SongDepartment of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, China.
Wing W Y NgGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Cyberspace Information, School of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Songfu FengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Honghua YuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNSouth China University of Technology · CNSouthern Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNGeneral Hospital of Central Theater CommandThe Second Nanning People's Hospital · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Prediction of ROP before onset holds great promise for reducing the risk of blindness. Objective: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) system to predict the occurrence and severity of ROP before 45 weeks' postmenstrual age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective prognostic study included 7033 retinal photographs of 725 infants in the training set and 763 retinal photographs of 90 infants in the external validation set, along with 46 characteristics for each infant. All images of both eyes from the same infant taken at the first screening were labeled according to the final diagnosis made between the first screening and 45 weeks' postmenstrual age. The DL system was developed using retinal photographs from the first ROP screening and clinical characteristics before or at the first screening in infants born between June 3, 2017, and August 28, 2019. Exposures: Two models were specifically designed for predictions of the occurrence (occurrence network [OC-Net]) and severity (severity network [SE-Net]) of ROP. Five-fold cross-validation was applied for internal validation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to evaluate the performance in ROP prediction. Results: This study included 815 infants (450 [55.2%] boys) with mean birth weight of 1.91 kg (95% CI, 1.87-1.95 kg) and mean gestational age of 33.1 weeks (95% CI, 32.9-33.3 weeks). In internal validation, mean AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92), 52.8% (95% CI, 49.2%-56.4%), 100% (95% CI, 97.4%-100%), and 37.8% (95% CI, 33.7%-42.1%), respectively, for OC-Net to predict ROP occurrence and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91), 68.0% (95% CI, 61.2%-74.8%), 100% (95% CI, 93.2%-100%), and 46.6% (95% CI, 37.3%-56.0%), respectively, for SE-Net to predict severe ROP. In external validation, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.94, 33.3%, 100%, and 7.5%, respectively, for OC-Net, and 0.88, 56.0%, 100%, and 35.3%, respectively, for SE-Net. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the DL system achieved promising accuracy in ROP prediction. This DL system is potentially useful in identifying infants with high risk of developing ROP.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRetinopathy of PrematurityBlindnessFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35708686
PMCPMC10881218
OpenAlexW4282969432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.