Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708498›Full record

SynthesisPhysical therapy2022

Perceptions and Experiences of Individuals With Neck Pain: A Systematic Critical Review of Qualitative Studies With Meta-Summary and Meta-Synthesis.

Luca Falsiroli Maistrello, Laura Zanconato, Alvisa Palese, Tommaso Geri, Andrea Turolla, Silvia Gianola, Andrea Dell'Isola, Giacomo Rossettini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physical therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Women's Causal Beliefs About Their Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Patients' experiences with musculoskeletal spinal pain: a qualitative systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient-centered modeling of the breast biopsy experience.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luca Falsiroli MaistrelloSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5487-3200
Laura ZanconatoPrivate Practice, Vicenza, Italy.
Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Tommaso GeriPrivate Practice, Pistoia, Italy.
Andrea TurollaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences DIBINEM, Alma Mater University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia GianolaIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3770-0011
Andrea Dell'IsolaClinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Orthopaedic, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0319-458X
Giacomo RossettiniSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1623-7681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed at exploring the perspectives and experiences of individuals with neck pain by synthesizing all available qualitative studies.

methodsA systematic, qualitative meta-summary and meta-synthesis was conducted following the 5-step methodology proposed by Sandelowski and Barroso. A systematic search of 9 electronic databases was conducted in May 2021. Methodological quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool.

resultsNine studies were included in the meta-synthesis for a total of 103 participants (73 women). Eleven categories were identified as belonging to 3 main themes: physical ("My neck has gone wrong"); psychological ("I am worried about my recovery"); and social ("Pain limits my life"). In the physical theme, the categories with the highest frequency were symptoms (67%) followed by body perception (44%). The psychological theme frequencies from highest to lowest were psychological consequences (100%), coping strategies (100%), mindset (67%), expectations from health care professionals (44%), and gender influence (22%). In the social theme, frequencies from highest to lowest were social relationships (56%), work, and activities of daily living and physical activity (44%, respectively).

conclusionAn individual's experience with neck pain is a multidimensional phenomenon in which physical, psychological, and social dimensions influence each other. These findings suggested that health care professionals should be aware of recognizing and evaluating all of the individual's experiences to offer a truly patient-centered care pathway. IMPACT: This qualitative meta-synthesis responded to a call to action to explore perspectives and experiences of individuals with neck pain. These findings can provide crucial guidance for clinicians as they plan and implement evidence-based recommendations for neck pain.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingNeck PainAdaptation, PsychologicalFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleQualitative ResearchNeck PainQualitativeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35708498
PMCPMC9384136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.