Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708210›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2022

Hierarchical multivariate directed acyclic graph autoregressive models for spatial diseases mapping.

Leiwen Gao, Abhirup Datta, Sudipto Banerjee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leiwen GaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abhirup DattaDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sudipto BanerjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-208X
University of California, Los Angeles · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Large Spatially and Temporally Misaligned Data in Environmental Health ApplicationsR01ES027027 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BANERJEE, SUDIPTO · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Flexible Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Estimating Inhalation ExposuresR01ES030210 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BANERJEE, SUDIPTO · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
Bayesian Modeling and Inference for High-Dimensional Disease Mapping and Boundary Detection"R01GM148761 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sudipto Banerjee · 2023 to 2026
$1.2M
Hierachial Modeling Approaches for Geographical Boundary Analysis in Cancer StudiR01CA112444 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BANERJEE, SUDIPTO · 2006 to 2008
$705k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112444NIEHS NIH HHS 5R01ES027027NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027027NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030210NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES030210NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM148761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease mapping is an important statistical tool used by epidemiologists to assess geographic variation in disease rates and identify lurking environmental risk factors from spatial patterns. Such maps rely upon spatial models for regionally aggregated data, where neighboring regions tend to exhibit similar outcomes than those farther apart. We contribute to the literature on multivariate disease mapping, which deals with measurements on multiple (two or more) diseases in each region. We aim to disentangle associations among the multiple diseases from spatial autocorrelation in each disease. We develop multivariate directed acyclic graphical autoregression models to accommodate spatial and inter-disease dependence. The hierarchical construction imparts flexibility and richness, interpretability of spatial autocorrelation and inter-disease relationships, and computational ease, but depends upon the order in which the cancers are modeled. To obviate this, we demonstrate how Bayesian model selection and averaging across orders are easily achieved using bridge sampling. We compare our method with a competitor using simulation studies and present an application to multiple cancer mapping using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalSpatial Analysisareal data analysisBayesian hierarchical modelsdirected acyclic graphical autoregressionmultiple disease mappingmultivariate areal data models

Identifiers

PMID35708210
PMCPMC10719081
OpenAlexW4226335512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.