Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708202›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2022

Generating spatiotemporal patterns of linearly polarised light at high frame rates for insect vision research.

Jack A Supple, Léandre Varennes-Phillit, Dexter Gajjar-Reid, Uroš Cerkvenik, Gregor Belušič, Holger G Krapp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncertainty minimization and pattern recognition inJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jack A SuppleDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Royal School of Mines, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5429-2120
Léandre Varennes-PhillitDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Royal School of Mines, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4213-8003
Dexter Gajjar-ReidDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Royal School of Mines, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Uroš CerkvenikDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-9945
Gregor BelušičDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-3571-1948
Holger G KrappDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Royal School of Mines, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-8131
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific ResearchAir Force Research LaboratoryAir Force Research Laboratory FA9550-19-1-7005European Office of Aerospace Research and Development FA9550-18-1-7005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polarisation vision is commonplace among invertebrates; however, most experiments focus on determining behavioural and/or neurophysiological responses to static polarised light sources rather than moving patterns of polarised light. To address the latter, we designed a polarisation stimulation device based on superimposing polarised and non-polarised images from two projectors, which can display moving patterns at frame rates exceeding invertebrate flicker fusion frequencies. A linear polariser fitted to one projector enables moving patterns of polarised light to be displayed, whilst the other projector contributes arbitrary intensities of non-polarised light to yield moving patterns with a defined polarisation and intensity contrast. To test the device, we measured receptive fields of polarisation-sensitive Argynnis paphia butterfly photoreceptors for both non-polarised and polarised light. We then measured local motion sensitivities of the optic flow-sensitive lobula plate tangential cell H1 in Calliphora vicina blowflies under both polarised and non-polarised light, finding no polarisation sensitivity in this neuron.

Indexed as

ButterfliesOptic FlowAnimalsVision, OcularElectrophysiologyNeuroethologyNeurosciencePolarisation vision

Identifiers

PMID35708202
PMCPMC9339910
OpenAlexW4283014711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.