Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708198›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

A comparison of intracranial volume estimation methods and their cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with age.

Stener Nerland, Therese S Stokkan, Kjetil N Jørgensen, Laura A Wortinger, Geneviève Richard, Dani Beck, Dennis van der Meer, Lars T Westlye, Ole A Andreassen, Ingrid Agartz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hypothalamus and intracranial volume segmentation at the group level by use of a Gradio-CNN framework.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Elevated dementia risk, cognitive decline, and hippocampal atrophy in multisite chronic pain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stener NerlandDepartment of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8771-8856
Therese S StokkanDepartment of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3609-1058
Kjetil N JørgensenNORMENT, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5751-4809
Laura A WortingerDepartment of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2721-3172
Geneviève RichardNORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6475-2576
Dani BeckDepartment of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0974-9304
Dennis van der MeerSchool of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0466-386X
Lars T WestlyeNORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8644-956X
Ole A AndreassenDepartment of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-3568
Ingrid AgartzDepartment of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9839-5391
Claudia BarthDepartment of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6544-0945

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial volume (ICV) is frequently used in volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, both as a covariate and as a variable of interest. Findings of associations between ICV and age have varied, potentially due to differences in ICV estimation methods. Here, we compared five commonly used ICV estimation methods and their associations with age. T1-weighted cross-sectional MRI data was included for 651 healthy individuals recruited through the NORMENT Centre (mean age = 46.1 years, range = 12.0-85.8 years) and 2410 healthy individuals recruited through the UK Biobank study (UKB, mean age = 63.2 years, range = 47.0-80.3 years), where longitudinal data was also available. ICV was estimated with FreeSurfer (eTIV and sbTIV), SPM12, CAT12, and FSL. We found overall high correlations across ICV estimation method, with the lowest observed correlations between FSL and eTIV (r = .87) and between FSL and CAT12 (r = .89). Widespread proportional bias was found, indicating that the agreement between methods varied as a function of head size. Body weight, age, sex, and mean ICV across methods explained the most variance in the differences between ICV estimation methods, indicating possible confounding for some estimation methods. We found both positive and negative cross-sectional associations with age, depending on dataset and ICV estimation method. Longitudinal ICV reductions were found for all ICV estimation methods, with annual percentage change ranging from -0.293% to -0.416%. This convergence of longitudinal results across ICV estimation methods offers strong evidence for age-related ICV reductions in mid- to late adulthood.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedYoung Adultagingbrain morphometrybrain segmentationintracranial volumemagnetic resonance imagingmethods comparison

Identifiers

PMID35708198
PMCPMC9491281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.