Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708124›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2022

Passively scanned, single-fiber optical coherence tomography probes for gastrointestinal devices.

David O Otuya, Nicholas M Dechene, Darina Poshtupaka, Seth Judson, Camella J Carlson, Sarah K Zemlok, Evan Sevieri, Peter Choy, Rachel E Shore, Esmarline De León-Peralta and 21 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David O OtuyaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-9599
Nicholas M DecheneWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Darina PoshtupakaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Seth JudsonWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Camella J CarlsonWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah K ZemlokWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Evan SevieriWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter ChoyWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel E ShoreWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Esmarline De León-PeraltaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alissa A CirioWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tyler W RihmWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexander A KrallWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Evangelia GavgiotakiWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5153-9901
Jing DongWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah L SilvaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aaron BaillargeonWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Grace BaldwinWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anna H GaoWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zachary JansaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amilcar BarriosWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emily RyanWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nitasha G M BhatWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Indira BalmashevaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anita ChungWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Catriona N GrantWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ara L BablouzianWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Matthew BeattyWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Osman O AhsenWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hui ZhengHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Guillermo J TearneyWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-4453
Harvard University · US

Funding

Natural History of Barrett's Esophagus Using Capsule EndomicroscopyR01CA184102 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TEARNEY, GUILLERMO J · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Celiac Disease Diagnosis using Tethered Capsule EndomicroscopyR01DK100569 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TEARNEY, GUILLERMO J · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184102NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesOptical coherence tomography (OCT) uses low coherence interferometry to obtain depth-resolved tissue reflectivity profiles (M-mode) and transverse beam scanning to create images of two-dimensional tissue morphology (B-mode). Endoscopic OCT imaging probes typically employ proximal or distal mechanical beam scanning mechanisms that increase cost, complexity, and size. Here, we demonstrate in the gastrointestinal (GI) tracts of unsedated human patients, that a passive, single-fiber probe can be used to guide device placement, conduct device-tissue physical contact sensing, and obtain two-dimensional OCT images via M-to-B-mode conversion. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe designed and developed ultrasmall, manually scannable, side- and forward-viewing single fiber-optic probes that can capture M-mode OCT data. Side-viewing M-mode OCT probes were incorporated into brush biopsy devices designed to harvest the microbiome and forward-viewing M-mode OCT probes were integrated into devices that measure intestinal potential difference (IPD). The M-mode OCT probe-coupled devices were utilized in the GI tract in six unsedated patients in vivo. M-mode data were converted into B-mode images using an M-to-B-mode conversion algorithm. The effectiveness of physical contact sensing by the M-mode OCT probes was assessed by comparing the variances of the IPD values when the probe was in physical contact with the tissue versus when it was not. The capacity of forward- and side-viewing M-mode OCT probes to produce high-quality B-mode images was compared by computing the percentages of the M-to-B-mode images that showed close contact between the probe and the luminal surface. Passively scanned M-to-B-mode images were qualitatively compared to B-mode images obtained by mechanical scanning OCT tethered capsule endomicroscopy (TCE) imaging devices.

resultsThe incorporation of M-mode OCT probes in these nonendoscopic GI devices safely and effectively enabled M-mode OCT imaging, facilitating real-time device placement guidance and contact sensing in vivo. Results showed that M-mode OCT contact sensing improved the variance of IPD measurements threefold and side-viewing probes increased M-to-B-mode image visibility by 10%. Images of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum generated by the passively scanned probes and M-to-B-mode conversion were qualitatively superior to B-mode images obtained by mechanically scanning OCT TCE devices.

conclusionThese results show that passive, single optical fiber OCT probes can be effectively utilized for nonendoscopic device placement guidance, device contact sensing, and two-dimensional morphologic imaging in the human GI tract in vivo. Due to their small size, lower cost, and reduced complexity, these M-mode OCT probes may provide an easier avenue for the incorporation of OCT functionality into endoscopic/nonendoscopic devices.

Indexed as

Fiber Optic TechnologyTomography, Optical CoherenceBiopsyEndoscopesEndoscopyHumansB-mode OCTendoscopic probeM-mode OCT

Identifiers

PMID35708124
PMCPMC9541095
OpenAlexW4283013842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.