Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708102›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research2022

In-utero cannabis exposure and long-term psychiatric and neurodevelopmental outcomes: The limitations of existing literature and recommendations for future research.

Ayesha C Sujan, Kelly C Young-Wolff, Lyndsay A Avalos

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A systematic review ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayesha C SujanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4374-9949
Kelly C Young-WolffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Lyndsay A AvalosDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Maternal Marijuana Use During Pregnancy, Marijuana Legalization, and Adverse Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes: A 12-year Cohort StudyR01DA047405 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AVALOS, LYNDSAY AMMON, YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Impact of in utero Marijuana Exposure on Neurodevelopment, Behavior and Mental Health: A Longitudinal Birth Cohort StudyR01DA048033 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AVALOS, LYNDSAY AMMON, YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2020 to 2025
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047405NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given increases in cannabis use in pregnancy and animal model research showing effects of in-utero cannabis exposure, high-quality information on long-term consequences of in-utero cannabis exposure in humans is needed. While reviews have summarized findings from observational studies with humans, reviews have not focused on limitations of these studies and recommendations for future research. Therefore, we critically reviewed observational research on in-utero cannabis exposure and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental outcomes measured at or after age 3 and provided recommendations for future research. We used Web of Science, Google Scholar, and work cited from relevant identified publications to identify 46 papers to include in our review. Our review includes two main sections. The first section highlights the extensive limitations of the existing research, which include small and nongeneralizable samples, reliance on self-reported data, lack of detail on timing and amount of exposure, inclusion of older exposure data only, not accounting for important confounders, inclusion of potential mediators as covariates, not including outcome severity measures, and not assessing for offspring sex differences. The second section provides recommendations for future research regarding exposure and outcome measures, sample selection, confounder adjustment, and other methodological considerations. For example, with regard to exposure definition, we recommend that studies quantify the amount of cannabis exposure, evaluate the influence of timing of exposure, and incorporate biological measures (e.g., urine toxicology measures). Given that high-quality information on long-term consequences of in-utero cannabis exposure in humans does not yet exit, it is crucial for future research to address the limitations we have identified.

Indexed as

CannabisAnimalsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePregnancyResearch Designcannabismarijuananeurodevelopmental outcomespregnancyprenatal exposurepsychiatric outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35708102
PMCPMC9357094
OpenAlexW4282969910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.