Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35708013›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology2022

Materials-based vaccines for infectious diseases.

Yang Bo, Hua Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Current Challenges of Vaccination in Fish Health Management.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Materials-based vaccines for infectious diseases.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yang BoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Hua WangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1157-8786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases that result from pathogen infection are among the leading causes of human death, with pathogens such as human immunodeficiency virus, malaria, influenza, and ongoing SARS-COV-2 viruses constantly threatening the global population. While the mechanisms behind various infectious diseases are not entirely clear and thus retard the development of effective therapeutics, vaccines have served as a universal approach to containing infectious diseases. However, conventional vaccines that solely consist of antigens or simply mix antigens and adjuvants have failed to control various highly infective or deadly pathogens. Biomaterials-based vaccines have provided a promising solution due to their ability to synergize the function of antigens and adjuvants, troubleshoot delivery issues, home and manipulate immune cells in situ. In this review, we will summarize different types of materials-based vaccines for generating cellular and humoral responses against pathogens and discuss the design criteria for amplifying the efficacy of materials-based vaccines against infectious diseases. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Infectious Disease.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigensHumansSARS-CoV-2Adjuvants, ImmunologicAntigensVaccinesadjuvantantigenimmune responseinfectious diseasepathogenvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35708013
PMCPMC9541041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.