Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707979›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

A near-deterministic mutational hotspot in Pseudomonas fluorescens is constructed by multiple interacting genomic features.

M J Shepherd, J S Horton, T B Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transient mutation bias increases the predictability of evolution on an empirical genotype-phenotype landscape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J ShepherdMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
J S HortonMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3608-538X
T B TaylorMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
University of Bath · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L015080/1Medical Research Council MR/T030062/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation - whilst stochastic - is frequently biased toward certain loci. When combined with selection this results in highly repeatable and predictable evolutionary outcomes. Immotile variants of the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens (SBW25) possess a 'mutational hotspot' that facilitates repeated occurrences of an identical de novo single nucleotide polymorphism when re-evolving motility, where ≥95% independent lines fix the mutation ntrB A289C. Identifying hotspots of similar potency in other genes and genomic backgrounds would prove valuable for predictive evolutionary models, but to do so we must understand the genomic features that enable such a hotspot to form. Here we reveal that genomic location, local nucleotide sequence, gene strandedness and presence of mismatch repair proteins operate in combination to facilitate the formation of this mutational hotspot. Our study therefore provides a framework for utilising genomic features to predict and identify hotspot positions capable of enforcing near-deterministic evolution.

Indexed as

Mutation biasMutation hotspotPredicting evolution

Identifiers

PMID35707979
PMCPMC9234803
OpenAlexW4283014100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.