Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707930›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of endoscopic surgery2022

Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Takahiro Yamanashi, Hirohisa Miura, Toshimichi Tanaka, Akiko Watanabe, Takuya Goto, Keigo Yokoi, Ken Kojo, Masahiro Niihara, Kei Hosoda, Takashi Kaizu and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takahiro YamanashiDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0073-5205
Hirohisa MiuraDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Toshimichi TanakaDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Akiko WatanabeDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-6422
Takuya GotoDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Keigo YokoiDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Ken KojoDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Masahiro NiiharaDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Kei HosodaDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-2889
Takashi KaizuDepartment of General, Pediatric and Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Keishi YamashitaDivision of Advanced Surgical Oncology Department of Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Takeo SatoResearch and Development Center for Medical Education, Department Clinical Skills Education, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Yusuke KumamotoDepartment of General, Pediatric and Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Naoki HikiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6857-8736
Takeshi NaitohDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-6334
Kitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhether rectal cancer surgery by robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery provides beneficial advantages remains controversial. Although favorable outcomes in terms of the safety and technical feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery have been demonstrated for rectal cancer, long-term oncological outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery have only been examined in a few studies. This retrospective study of subjects who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery evaluated short- and long-term outcomes of consecutive rectal cancer patients.

methodsBetween November 2016 and January 2020, we analyzed the records of 62 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes.

resultsTumors were located in the lower or mid-rectum (88.7%) in most patients. The median operative time was 357 min. No patient received transfusions, and the median blood loss was 10.5 ml. Open laparotomy was not required in any patient. A Clavien-Dindo classification of all grades was observed in 12 patients (19.4%). Positive radial margin was not observed in any patient. Duration of median follow-up was 40.5 mo, while 3-y overall survival and 3-y relapse-free survival rates were 96.8% and 85.0%, respectively. The local recurrence rate was 3.4%.

conclusionFavorable short- and long-term outcomes demonstrated robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery was safe and technically feasible for rectal cancer.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomelong-term outcomesrectal cancerrobotic-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID35707930
PMCPMC9796680
OpenAlexW4283025265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.