ArticleCancer science2022
The prognosis of endometrial cancers stratified with conventional risk factors and modified molecular classification.
Article in Cancer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated immunophenotypic and ProMisE molecular profiling as predictors of immune checkpoint inhibitor response in recurrent endometrial cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
- Article
- Predictive value of immunohistochemical parameters combined with clinicopathological features in predicting recurrence after lymph node resection in endometrial cancer patients.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Impact of immunohistochemistry-based molecular classification with conventional risk stratification on recurrence and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the TCGA-Surrogate (ProMisE) Molecular Classification and Clinical Features of Endometrial Carcinoma: A Study of 97 Cases from China.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Optimizing Final Pathology Determination in Endometrial Cancer: The Role of PET/CT, MRI, and Biopsy in Serous, Mixed Cell, Clear Cell, and Grade 3 Endometrioid Subtypes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Understanding the impact of spatial immunophenotypes on the survival of endometrial cancer patients through the ProMisE classification.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- The impact of integrated genomic analysis on molecular classifications and prognostic risk stratification in endometrial cancer: a Chinese experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The prognosis of endometrial cancers stratified with conventional risk factors and modified molecular classification.Cancer science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to validate the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer, a modified version of The Cancer Genome Atlas, using data from 184 patients with endometrial cancer (median age: 57.5 years; median follow-up period: 109 months) who had undergone radical surgery (including systemic lymphadenectomy) and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (patients with intermediate or high recurrence risk) from 2003 to 2015. Tissue microarrays were prepared from surgical specimens and classified using the conventional clinical risk classifier. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect mismatch repair proteins, L1 cell adhesion molecule, and p53. Direct sequencing was used to identify hotspot mutations in the polymerase-epsilon gene. Forty-five patients were identified as having high L1 cell adhesion molecule expression, 41 as low risk, 34 as mismatch repair-deficient, 13 as polymerase-epsilon gene-mutated, five as having abnormal p53, and 46 as other. Patients were stratified into significantly different prognostic groups (p < 0.0001): favorable (low risk and polymerase-epsilon gene-mutated), intermediate (mismatch repair-deficient and other), and unfavorable (high L1 cell adhesion molecule expression and abnormal p53) with 5-year disease-specific survival rates of 100%, 93.8%, and 75.1%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier method). The combination of conventional recurrent risk classification, sequencing for polymerase-epsilon gene mutations and immunohistochemistry for L1 cell adhesion molecule, p53, and mismatch repair proteins can be used to determine the prognoses of patients with endometrial cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.