ArticleJournal of applied statistics2022
Robust estimation of models for longitudinal data with dropouts and outliers.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Missing data and outliers usually arise in longitudinal studies. Ignoring the effects of missing data and outliers will make the classical generalized estimating equation approach invalid. The longitudinal cohort study of rheumatoid arthritis patients was designed to investigate whether the Health Assessment Questionnaire score was associated with baseline covariates and changed with time. There exist dropouts and outliers in the data. In order to analyze the data, we develop a robust estimating equation approach. To deal with the responses missing at random, we extend a doubly robust method. To achieve robustness against outliers, we utilize an outlier robust method, which corrects the bias induced by outliers through centralizing the covariate matrix in the estimating equation. The doubly robust method for dropouts is easy to combine with the outlier robust method. The proposed method has the property of robustness in the sense that the proposed estimator is not only doubly robust against model misspecification for dropouts when there is no outlier in the data, but also robust against outliers. Consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator are established under regularity conditions. A comprehensive simulation study and real data analysis demonstrate that the proposed estimator does have the property of robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.