Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707793›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Prevalence and Trends in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement: Results From a 10-Year, Nationwide Analysis.

Marcin Folwarski, Stanislaw Klek, Michał Brzeziński, Agnieszka Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz, Adam Wyszomirski, Jarosław Meyer-Szary, Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on gastrostomy feeding tubes: methodology and review of evidence.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Deconstructing the steps of pull-type PEG tube insertion.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcin FolwarskiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Stanislaw KlekSurgical Oncology Clinic, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Cancer Institute, Kraków, Poland.
Michał BrzezińskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, Allergology, and Nutrition, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Agnieszka Szlagatys-SidorkiewiczDepartment of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, Allergology, and Nutrition, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Adam WyszomirskiDepartment of Adult Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Jarosław Meyer-SzaryDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Karolina Skonieczna-ŻydeckaDepartment of Biochemical Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most commonly used access for long-term enteral nutrition. Only a few studies report the prevalence and epidemiology of PEG placements. No previous data concentrated on the healthcare system issues influencing the qualification rates and professional nutritional support for individuals with PEG. Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide analysis of PEG placements in Poland from 2010 to 2020. The central data on ICD-10 coding of adult patients with PEG reported to the insurance company were used for the analysis of general and regional prevalence, age, and primary and secondary diseases. Rates of patients with home enteral nutrition (HEN) were calculated with a special focus on patients with cancer. A secondary aim was to determine the causes of regional disparities among administrative regions. Results: A total number of 90,182 PEGs were placed during the observation period. The number was increasing each year with statistical significance. Malnutrition, dysphagia, and cardiorespiratory/metabolic diseases were the most frequently reported primary diseases. A total of 11.98% of all patients were diagnosed with cancer; 49.9% of oncological patients suffered from head and neck cancer (HNC) and 19.9% from esophageal cancer. In total, 6.61% of HNC and 27.46% of patients with esophageal cancer from the Polish National Cancer Registry (NCR) had PEG. The rates of patients in more advanced ages (65-74 and over 85 years) were growing and decreased in younger groups (18-24, 45-54, and 55-64 years). Overall, 27.6% of all (11.86% of cancer) patients with PEG were reimbursed HEN. A high number of patients in nursing care facilities, lower education of citizens, and lower number of hospital beds were associated with more PEG insertions in the administrative regions. Conclusion: The number of PEG placements has been increasing, particularly in the elderly. Systemic solutions must be found to address the problems of regional disparities in PEG's prevalence as well as the lack of inclusion criteria for nutritional support.

Indexed as

enteral nutritiongastrostomyhead and neck cancerhome enteral nutritionPEG

Identifiers

PMID35707793
PMCPMC9189377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.