ArticleBJR open2021
Assessment of body composition and association with clinical outcomes in patients with lung and colorectal cancer.
Article in BJR open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patterns of Body Composition Changes and Their Predictors During Cancer Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Adult Oncology Patients With Varying Baseline Nutritional Status at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Association of CT-assessed sarcopenia and the development of immune-related adverse events and overall survival: a multistate survival analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Exchange of Quantitative Computed Tomography Assessed Body Composition Data Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources as a Necessary Step Toward Interoperable Integration of Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Practice: Methodological Development Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Medical imaging in cancer cachexia.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Obesity and lung cancer-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess body composition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer using whole-body MRI and relate this to clinical outcomes. Methods: 53 patients with NSCLC (28 males, 25 females; mean age 66.9) and 74 patients with colorectal cancer (42 males, 32 females; mean age 62.9) underwent staging whole-body MRI scans, which were post-processed to derive fat mass (FM), fat free mass (FFM) and skeletal muscle (SM) indices and SM fat fraction (FF). These were compared between the two cancer cohorts using two-sided Results: Patients with NSCLC had significantly lower FFM ( Conclusions: Patients with NSCLC had lower FFM and SM indices than patients with colorectal cancer and greater SMFF, indicating lower SM mass with fatty infiltration. These findings reflect differences in the phenotype of the two groups and suggest patients with lung cancer are more likely to require additional nutritional support. Advances in knowledge: Body composition differs between NSCLC and colorectal cancer. Patients with NSCLC have both a reduced SM mass and greater SM FF suggesting that they are more nutritionally deplete than patients with colorectal cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.