Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707738›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2021

A doubly-inflated Poisson regression for correlated count data.

Erfan Ghasemi, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Farid Zayeri, Asma Pourhoseingholi, Seyed Mohammadreza Safavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erfan GhasemiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza Akbarzadeh BaghbanProteomics Research Center, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farid ZayeriProteomics Research Center and Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Asma PourhoseingholiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohammadreza SafaviResearch Institute of Dental Sciences, Dental Research Center, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Count data have emerged in many applied research areas. In recent years, there has been a considerable interest in models for count data. In modelling such data, it is common to face a large frequency of zeroes. The data are regarded as zero-inflated when the frequency of observed zeroes is larger than what is expected from a theoretical distribution such as Poisson distribution, as a standard model for analysing count data. Data analysis, using the simple Poisson model, may lead to over-dispersion. Several classes of different mixture models were proposed for handling zero-inflated data. But they do not apply to cases when inflated counts happen at some other points, in addition to zero. In these cases, a doubly-inflated Poisson model has been suggested which only be used for cross-sectional data and cannot consider correlations between observations. However, correlated count data have a large application, especially in the health and medical fields. The present study aims to introduce a Doubly-Inflated Poisson models with random effect for correlated doubly-inflated data. Then, the best performance of the proposed method is shown via different simulation scenarios. Finally, the proposed model is applied to a dental study.

Indexed as

correlated dataCount datadoubly-inflatedPoisson regressionzero-inflated

Identifiers

PMID35707738
PMCPMC9042150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.