Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707609›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2020

Statistical regression analysis of functional and shape data.

Mengmeng Guo, Jingyong Su, Li Sun, Guofeng Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengmeng GuoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Jingyong SuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Li SunDepartment of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Guofeng CaoDepartment of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4827-1558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We develop a multivariate regression model when responses or predictors are on nonlinear manifolds, rather than on Euclidean spaces. The nonlinear constraint makes the problem challenging and needs to be studied carefully. By performing principal component analysis (PCA) on tangent space of manifold, we use principal directions instead in the model. Then, the ordinary regression tools can be utilized. We apply the framework to both shape data (ozone hole contours) and functional data (spectrums of absorbance of meat in Tecator dataset). Specifically, we adopt the square-root velocity function representation and parametrization-invariant metric. Experimental results have shown that we can not only perform powerful regression analysis on the non-Euclidean data but also achieve high prediction accuracy by the constructed model.

Indexed as

functional regressionPCARiemannian manifoldsShape analysissquare-root velocity function

Identifiers

PMID35707609
PMCPMC9038059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.