Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707599›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2022

Expression of CD44

Unedo Hence Markus Sihombing, Andrijono, Gatot Purwoto, Supriadi Gandamihardja, Alida R Harahap, Primariadewi Rustamadji, Aria Kekalih, Retno Widyawati, Dzicky Rifqi Fuady

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Unedo Hence Markus SihombingGynecologic-Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tarakan Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
AndrijonoGynecologic-Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Gatot PurwotoGynecologic-Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Supriadi GandamihardjaGynecologic-Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Alida R HarahapDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia.
Primariadewi RustamadjiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Aria KekalihOccupational Medicine Division, Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Retno WidyawatiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Budhi Asih Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Dzicky Rifqi FuadyGynecologic-Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo · IDEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology · IDPadjadjaran University · IDUniversity of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: Ovarian cancer is the 8th deadliest common cancer in women around the world. Almost all ovarian cancer patients would experience chemoresistance, recurrence, and poor prognosis after cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Chemoresistant cancer cells have characteristic expressions of cancer stem cell proteins (CSCs) CD44 Materials and methods: This study was conducted with a prospective cohort of 64 patients who is divided into two groups (32 patients in each group) at the Obstetrics-gynecology and pathology department of Cipto Mangunkusumo, Tarakan, Dharmais, and Fatmawati Hospital. All suspected ovarian cancer patients underwent cytoreductive debulking and histopathological examination. Chemotherapy was given for six series followed by six months of observation. After the observation, we determined the therapy's response with the RECIST Criteria (Response Criteria in Solid Tumors) and then classified the results into chemoresistant or chemosensitive groups. Flow cytometry blood tests were then performed to examine the expression of CD44 Results: There was a significant relationship between increased levels of CD44 Conclusions: These results indicate that CD44

Indexed as

ALDHA, Aldehyde DehydrogenaseBRCA, Breast Cancer GeneCD105, Cluster of Differentiation 105CD106, Cluster of Differentiation 106CD24, Cluster of Differentiation 24CD44+/CD24-CD44, Cluster of Differentiation 44ChemoresistanceCSCs, Cancer Stem CellsDDB2DDB2, DNA Damage Binding Protein 2DDR, DNA Damage ResponseEMT, Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal TransitionFA, Fanconi AnemiaHR, Homologous RecombinationJAK-STAT, Janus Kinase and Signal Transducer and Activator of TranscriptionNER, Nucleotide Excision RepairOS, Overall SurvivalOvarian CancerPFS, Progression-Free SurvivalPRR, Post Replication RepairRAD6RECIST, Response Criteria in Solid TumorsSOX-2, SRY-Box Transcription Factor 2TLS, Translesion SynthesisUBE2, E2 Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID35707599
PMCPMC9189034
OpenAlexW4281635839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.