Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707489›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2020

Small area mean estimation after effect clustering.

Zhihuang Yang, Jiahua Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhihuang YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Jiahua ChenSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing reliable estimates of subpopulation/area parameters has attracted increased attention due to their importance in applications such as policymaking. Due to low or even no samples from some areas, we must adopt indirect model approaches. Existing indirect small area estimation methods often assume that a single nested error regression model is suitable for all the small areas. In particular, the effects of the auxiliary variables are either fixed or have a single attraction center. In some applications, it can be more appropriate to cluster the small areas so that the effects of the auxiliary variables are fixed but have multiple centers in the nested error regression model. In this paper, we examine an extended nested error regression model in which the auxiliary variables have mixed effects with multiple centers. We use a penalty approach to identify these centers and estimate the model parameters simultaneously. We then propose two new small area mean estimators and construct estimators of their mean square errors. Simulations based on artificial and realistic finite populations show that the new estimators can be efficient. Furthermore, the confidence intervals based on the new methods have accurate coverage probabilities. We illustrate the proposed methods with the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics conducted in Canada.

Indexed as

62D05Nested error regression modelseparation penaltysmall area clustersmall area estimation

Identifiers

PMID35707489
PMCPMC9042082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.