Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707414›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2020

Assessing uncertainty of voter transitions estimated from aggregated data. Application to the 2017 French presidential election.

Rafael Romero, Jose M Pavía, Jorge Martín, Gerardo Romero

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Editorial to special issue V WCDANM 2018.Journal of applied statistics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael RomeroDpto. de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jose M PavíaGIPEyOP, UMICCS, Quantitatve Methods Area, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jorge MartínDpto. de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Gerardo RomeroConsultoría, Innovación y Desarrollo S.L., Valencia, Spain.
Universitat Politècnica de València · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferring electoral individual behaviour from aggregated data is a very active research area, with ramifications in sociology and political science. A new approach based on linear programming is proposed to estimate voter transitions among parties (or candidates) between two elections. Compared to other linear and quadratic programming models previously published, our approach presents two important innovations. Firstly, it explicitly deals with new entries and exits in the election census without assuming unrealistic hypotheses, enabling a reasonable estimation of vote behaviour of young electors voting for the first time. Secondly, by exploiting the information contained in the model residuals, we develop a procedure to assess the uncertainty in the estimates. This significantly distinguishes our model from other published mathematical programming methods. The method is illustrated estimating the vote transfer matrix between the first and second rounds of the 2017 French presidential election and measuring its level of uncertainty. Likewise, compared to the most current alternatives based on ecological regression, our approach is considerably simpler and faster, and has provided reasonable results in all the actual elections to which it has been applied. Interested scholars can easily use our procedure with the aid of the R-function provided in the Supplemental Material.

Indexed as

Ecological InferenceFrench electionsLinear ProgrammingR × C contingency tablesVoter transitions

Identifiers

PMID35707414
PMCPMC9041978
OpenAlexW3048821497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.