Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707373›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk Factors in the Medical Field: A Review.

Shah Hussain, Iqra Mubeen, Niamat Ullah, Syed Shahab Ud Din Shah, Bakhtawar Abduljalil Khan, Muhammad Zahoor, Riaz Ullah, Farhat Ali Khan, Mujeeb A Sultan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 221 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
221citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
86.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

221 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 662 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Non-invasive Imaging Modalities for Breslow Thickness Estimation in Melanoma: A Scoping Review.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Genetic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Shah HussainDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.
Iqra MubeenDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.
Niamat UllahDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Malakand, Pakistan.
Syed Shahab Ud Din ShahDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.
Bakhtawar Abduljalil KhanWomen's Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Muhammad ZahoorDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Dir Lower, KPK, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-8517
Riaz UllahDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-467X
Farhat Ali KhanDepartment of Pharmacy, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal, Dir Upper, KPK, Pakistan.
Mujeeb A SultanDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Aljanad University for Science and Technology, Taiz, Yemen.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7339-1925
Quaid-i-Azam University · PKUniversity of Malakand · PKAljanad University for Science and TechnologyHamad Medical Corporation · QAKing Saud University · SAShaheed Benazir Bhutto University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging is the process of visual representation of different tissues and organs of the human body to monitor the normal and abnormal anatomy and physiology of the body. There are many medical imaging techniques used for this purpose such as X-ray, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), digital mammography, and diagnostic sonography. These advanced medical imaging techniques have many applications in the diagnosis of myocardial diseases, cancer of different tissues, neurological disorders, congenital heart disease, abdominal illnesses, complex bone fractures, and other serious medical conditions. There are benefits as well as some risks to every imaging technique. There are some steps for minimizing the radiation exposure risks from imaging techniques. Advance medical imaging modalities such as PET/CT hybrid, three-dimensional ultrasound computed tomography (3D USCT), and simultaneous PET/MRI give high resolution, better reliability, and safety to diagnose, treat, and manage complex patient abnormalities. These techniques ensure the production of new accurate imaging tools with improving resolution, sensitivity, and specificity. In the future, with mounting innovations and advancements in technology systems, the medical diagnostic field will become a field of regular measurement of various complex diseases and will provide healthcare solutions.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35707373
PMCPMC9192206
OpenAlexW4281640569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.