ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Industry 5.0 technology capabilities in Trauma and Orthopaedics.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies for preventing anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes: Insights from a scoping review.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-based orthopaedic perpetual design.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- 3D printing for spine pathologies: a state-of-the-art review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Review
- Selective Laser Melting and Spark Plasma Sintering: A Perspective on Functional Biomaterials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- SMART (self- monitoring analysis and reporting technology) and sensor based technology applications in trauma and orthopaedic surgery.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Technology and orthopaedic surgeons.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The fifth industrial revolution, which is also known as Industry 5.0, involves the interaction of human intelligence and cognitive computing to deliver personalised products Aims: In this article, we explore the evolution of the Industry 5.0 revolution in the branch of trauma and orthopaedics. We highlight the interface of human intelligence, Robotic technology, and Smart machine systems in the development of personalised care for patients with orthopaedic conditions. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was conducted using databases of Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar and ResearchGate to discover the suitable literature published till March 2022 on the subject. The keywords used for the search included "Industry 5.0" and "Orthopaedics" to identify the appropriate literature and prepare this narrative review. Results: Industry 5.0 revolution appears to have made significant expansion on Industry 4.0 enabled technologies. Innovations in computer technology, implant designs, orthopaedic research, increased collaboration between humans, Robots and smart systems have led to multiple inventions. Industry 5.0 has led to the development of patient-specific implants, instruments, and devices in the sub-specialty of trauma and orthopaedics. Conclusion: Evolution of Industry 5.0 has paved the way to introduce personalised products in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of a spectrum of orthopaedic pathologies. By enabling automation and enhancing labour efficiency, Industry 5.0 has made it possible to engineer patient-specific tools, instruments and implants to improve clinical, functional, and Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.