ArticlePeerJ2022
The DNA methylation landscape of five pediatric-tumor types.
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- An international framework for clinical translation of molecular classifiers in osteosarcoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- ALKBH1 Gene rs6494 T>A Polymorphism Decreases Wilms Tumour Risk in Chinese Children.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Modifications in Osteosarcoma: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Tumors and their microenvironments: Learning from pediatric brain pathologies.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2025Review
- Role of epigenetics in paediatric cancer pathogenesis & drug resistance.British journal of cancer · 2025Review
- IncreasedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative responses to demethylating therapy in animal models of osteosarcoma.Research square · 2024Article
- Pan-cancer landscape of epigenetic factor expression predicts tumor outcome.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fewer DNA mutations have been identified in pediatric tumors than in adult tumors, suggesting that alternative tumorigenic mechanisms, including aberrant DNA methylation, may play a prominent role. In one epigenetic process of regulating gene expression, methyl groups are attached at the 5-carbon of the cytosine ring, leading to 5-methylcytosine (5mC). In somatic cells, 5mC occurs mostly in CpG islands, which are often within promoter regions. In Wilms tumors and acute myeloid leukemias, increased levels of epigenetic silencing have been associated with worse patient outcomes. However, to date, researchers have studied methylation primarily in adult tumors and for specific genes-but not on a pan-pediatric cancer scale. We addressed these gaps first by aggregating methylation data from 309 noncancerous samples, establishing baseline expectations for each probe and gene. Even though these samples represent diverse, noncancerous tissue types and population ancestral groups, methylation levels were consistent for most genes. Second, we compared tumor methylation levels against the baseline values for 489 pediatric tumors representing five cancer types: Wilms tumors, clear cell sarcomas of the kidney, rhabdoid tumors, neuroblastomas, and osteosarcomas. Tumor hypomethylation was more common than hypermethylation, and as many as 41.7% of genes were hypomethylated in a given tumor, compared to a maximum of 34.2% for hypermethylated genes. However, in known oncogenes, hypermethylation was more than twice as common as in other genes. We identified 139 probes (31 genes) that were differentially methylated between at least one tumor type and baseline levels, and 32 genes that were differentially methylated across the pediatric tumor types. We evaluated whether genomic events and aberrant methylation were mutually exclusive but did not find evidence of this phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.