Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707064›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2022

Use of Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) to Assess Response to Antidepressant Treatment in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Joachim Morrens, Maju Mathews, Vanina Popova, Stephane Borentain, Benoit Rive, Beatriz Gonzalez Martin Moro, Carol Jamieson, Qiaoyi Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Extended course accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation as a substitute for depressed patients needing electroconvulsive therapy.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Esketamine use in real-world clinical practice in patients with treatment-resistant depression.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Joachim MorrensJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Maju MathewsJanssen Global Services, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Vanina PopovaJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Stephane BorentainJanssen Global Services, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3312-1557
Benoit RiveJanssen-Cilag, Paris, France.
Beatriz Gonzalez Martin MoroJanssen-Cilag, Madrid, Spain.
Carol JamiesonJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Milpitas, CA, USA.
Qiaoyi ZhangJanssen Global Services, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USJanssen (Belgium) · BEJanssen (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This post-hoc analysis evaluated the agreement between Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score- and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score-based assessment of response in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with esketamine nasal spray plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant (ESK-NS + AD). Methods: Data were analyzed from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study (TRANSFORM-2) of flexibly dosed esketamine or placebo nasal spray plus a newly initiated oral-AD in adults with moderate-to-severe TRD. Patients with ≥50% reduction in MADRS from baseline at the end of the 4-week acute treatment phase were defined as responders. For the CGI-S-based assessment of response, patients with ≥2 points decrease from baseline or a CGI-S score of ≤3 (mildly depressed to normal) were considered responders. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to assess level of agreement between MADRS and CGI-S-based assessments. Results: At the end of 4-week treatment, the proportion of responders among all study patients (n=201) was similar when assessed using the MADRS (61%) and CGI-S (62%) methods, with substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa=0.76; sensitivity=92%; specificity=84%) between both methods. When restricting analysis to ESK-NS + AD-treated patients (n=101) who had a higher response rate (on MADRS: 69%; on CGI-S: 68%), the agreement remained substantial (Cohen's kappa=0.75; sensitivity=91%; specificity=84%). Conclusion: The CGI-S may be a practical and reliable alternative to the MADRS to assess response to ESK-NS + AD in patients with TRD and can be used in real-world practice to support informed treatment decisions.

Indexed as

antidepressant responseClinical Global Impressions-SeverityesketamineMontgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scaletreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID35707064
PMCPMC9189368
OpenAlexW4281790437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.