ArticleHGG advances2022
Lessons learned and recommendations for data coordination in collaborative research: The CSER consortium experience.
Article in HGG advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Research Informatics: Contributions from 2022.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Trial
- Exome sequencing early in outpatient evaluation in NCGENES 2: Changing the course of the diagnostic odyssey?HGG advances · 2026Article
- Determinants of DNA-sequence-based Diagnostic Yield in the CSER Consortium.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Evolving roles of Data Coordinating Centers in multisite research: Challenges and adaptations from a rapid scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Making genomic data FAIR through effective Data Portals.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A guide to developing harmonized research workflows in a team science context.Experimental neurology · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in portal hypertension and esophagogastric varices.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Long-read genome sequencing and variant reanalysis increase diagnostic yield in neurodevelopmental disorders.Genome research · 2024Article
- Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Lessons learned while starting multi-institutional genetics research in diverse populations: A report from the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating data across heterogeneous research environments is a key challenge in multi-site, collaborative research projects. While it is important to allow for natural variation in data collection protocols across research sites, it is also important to achieve interoperability between datasets in order to reap the full benefits of collaborative work. However, there are few standards to guide the data coordination process from project conception to completion. In this paper, we describe the experiences of the Clinical Sequence Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium Data Coordinating Center (DCC), which coordinated harmonized survey and genomic sequencing data from seven clinical research sites from 2020 to 2022. Using input from multiple consortium working groups and from CSER leadership, we first identify 14 lessons learned from CSER in the categories of communication, harmonization, informatics, compliance, and analytics. We then distill these lessons learned into 11 recommendations for future research consortia in the areas of planning, communication, informatics, and analytics. We recommend that planning and budgeting for data coordination activities occur as early as possible during consortium conceptualization and development to minimize downstream complications. We also find that clear, reciprocal, and continuous communication between consortium stakeholders and the DCC is equally important to maintaining a secure and centralized informatics ecosystem for pooling data. Finally, we discuss the importance of actively interrogating current approaches to data governance, particularly for research studies that straddle the research-clinical divide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.