Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35707062›Full record

ArticleHGG advances2022

Lessons learned and recommendations for data coordination in collaborative research: The CSER consortium experience.

Kathleen D Muenzen, Laura M Amendola, Tia L Kauffman, Kathleen F Mittendorf, Jeannette T Bensen, Flavia Chen, Richard Green, Bradford C Powell, Mark Kvale, Frank Angelo and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HGG advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Research Informatics: Contributions from 2022.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Determinants of DNA-sequence-based Diagnostic Yield in the CSER Consortium.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kathleen D MuenzenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, Division of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Laura M AmendolaDepartment of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tia L KauffmanCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Kathleen F MittendorfCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Jeannette T BensenDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Flavia ChenInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Richard GreenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, Division of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bradford C PowellDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mark KvaleInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Frank AngeloDepartment of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Laura FarnanLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stephanie M FullertonDepartment of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jill O RobinsonCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Tianran LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, Division of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Priyanka MuraliDepartment of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
James M J LawlorHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA.
Jeffrey OuDepartment of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lucia A HindorffDivision of Genomic Medicine, NHGRI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Gail P JarvikDepartment of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
David R CrosslinDivision of Biomedical Informatics and Genomics, John W. Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
North Carolina Clinical Genomic Evaluation by Next-gen Exome Sequencing 2U01HG006487 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BERG, JONATHAN S, POWELL, BRADFORD C. · 2012 to 2021
$22.7M
Measuring Perceptions of Utility of Clinical Genome Sequencing: Instrument Testing and ValidationU01HG006485 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MCGUIRE, AMY L, PARSONS, DONALD W. · 2012 to 2021
$22.1M
Incorporating genomics into the clinical care of diverse NYC childrenU01HG009610 · NHGRI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI GELB, BRUCE D, HOROWITZ, CAROL R · 2017 to 2021
$17.0M
Sharing Aggregate Genomics Research Findings with Diverse Participants: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Design StrategyU01HG009599 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KOENIG, BARBARA A., KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2017 to 2021
$16.3M
Exome sequencing in Diverse Populations in Colorado & OregonU01HG007292 · NHGRI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LEO, MICHAEL C, WILFOND, BENJAMIN SIMON · 2017 to 2021
$15.7M
South-seq: DNA sequencing for newborn nurseries in the SouthU01HG007301 · NHGRI · HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY · PI BARSH, GREGORY STEFAN, COOPER, GREGORY MICHAEL · 2017 to 2021
$11.9M
Evolving Our Partnership: The CSER2 Centralized Support Coordinating CenterU24HG007307 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FULLERTON, STEPHANIE MALIA, JARVIK, GAIL PAIRITZ · 2017 to 2021
$5.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006485NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006487NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007292NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007301NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009599NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009610NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG007307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating data across heterogeneous research environments is a key challenge in multi-site, collaborative research projects. While it is important to allow for natural variation in data collection protocols across research sites, it is also important to achieve interoperability between datasets in order to reap the full benefits of collaborative work. However, there are few standards to guide the data coordination process from project conception to completion. In this paper, we describe the experiences of the Clinical Sequence Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium Data Coordinating Center (DCC), which coordinated harmonized survey and genomic sequencing data from seven clinical research sites from 2020 to 2022. Using input from multiple consortium working groups and from CSER leadership, we first identify 14 lessons learned from CSER in the categories of communication, harmonization, informatics, compliance, and analytics. We then distill these lessons learned into 11 recommendations for future research consortia in the areas of planning, communication, informatics, and analytics. We recommend that planning and budgeting for data coordination activities occur as early as possible during consortium conceptualization and development to minimize downstream complications. We also find that clear, reciprocal, and continuous communication between consortium stakeholders and the DCC is equally important to maintaining a secure and centralized informatics ecosystem for pooling data. Finally, we discuss the importance of actively interrogating current approaches to data governance, particularly for research studies that straddle the research-clinical divide.

Indexed as

clinical researchdata coordinationdata governancedata harmonizationdata managementdata sharingmedical genomicsresearch collaborationresearch informatics

Identifiers

PMID35707062
PMCPMC9190054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.