Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706962›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2020

Bayesian analysis of immigration in Europe with generalized logistic regression.

Luciana Dalla Valle, Fabrizio Leisen, Luca Rossini, Weixuan Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luciana Dalla ValleSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7506-5712
Fabrizio LeisenSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Luca RossiniDepartment of Econometrics and Operations Research, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-4543
Weixuan ZhuWang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Department of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of immigrants moving to and settling in Europe has increased over the past decade, making migration one of the most topical and pressing issues in European politics. It is without a doubt that immigration has multiple impacts, in terms of economy, society and culture, on the European Union. It is fundamental to policy-makers to correctly evaluate people's attitudes towards immigration when designing integration policies. Of critical interest is to properly discriminate between subjects who are favourable towards immigration from those who are against it. Public opinions on migration are typically coded as binary responses in surveys. However, traditional methods, such as the standard logistic regression, may suffer from computational issues and are often not able to accurately model survey information. In this paper we propose an efficient Bayesian approach for modelling binary response data based on the generalized logistic regression. We show how the proposed approach provides an increased flexibility compared to traditional methods, due to its ability to capture heavy and light tails. The power of our methodology is tested through simulation studies and is illustrated using European Social Survey data on immigration collected in different European countries in 2016-2017.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceempirical likelihoodgeneralized logistic regressionimmigration

Identifiers

PMID35706962
PMCPMC9041886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.