Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706879›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2022

Effectiveness of Mobile Application for Promotion of Physical Activity Among Newly Diagnosed Patients of Type II Diabetes - A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lipilekha Patnaik, Sandeep Kumar Panigrahi, Abhay Kumar Sahoo, Debahuti Mishra, Anil Kumar Muduli, Saswatika Beura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lipilekha PatnaikDepartment of Community Medicine, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Khordha, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sandeep Kumar PanigrahiDepartment of Community Medicine, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Khordha, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Abhay Kumar SahooDepartment of Endocrinology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Khordha, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Debahuti MishraDepartment of Computer Science, Institute of Technical Education and Research, Siksha 'O'Anusandhan deemed to be University, Khordha, Odisha, India.
Anil Kumar MuduliDepartment of Community Medicine, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Khordha, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Saswatika BeuraDepartment of Community Medicine, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Khordha, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital · INInstitute of Technical Education · SGSiksha O Anusandhan University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mobile health intervention shows the positive effects on the management of chronic diseases. Therefore, the study was planned to study the effectiveness of a mobile-based application promotion of physical activity among newly diagnosed patients with type II diabetes. Methods: The present study was a parallel-design randomized controlled trial conducted over 2 years. The participants were type II diabetes patients between 18 and 60 years within 3 months of diagnosis who attended the endocrinology outpatient department having knowledge of using smart phone. The sample size was calculated to be 66 and 33 for each arm. The block random design method was adopted for allocation into different arms. A pretested interview schedule was used for the collection of data. Outcomes included body mass index, waist circumference, body fat percentage, and changes in the physical activity was obtained by global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ). The information thus collected were processed and analyzed using SPSS v 20. Results: The study included 66 patients aged between 18 and 60 years, out of which 33 were enrolled into control and 33 into intervention group. The mean age of the participants was 42.29 ± 9.5 years ranged from 25 years to 59 years, 65.2% were males and 34.8% were females. It was observed that a higher proportion of intervention participants met WHO recommendations of physical activity level. Total metabolic equivalent of task (MET) value per minute (Mean ± SD) was 1347.27 ± 1028.5 in the control group and 1223.03 ± 584.87 in intervention group at baseline and was not different ( Conclusions: Cost-effective, simple mobile applications may help in routine clinical practice to encourage the patients for the promotion of physical activity.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusdiabetic patientslife stylemobile appphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID35706879
PMCPMC9188870
OpenAlexW4285739767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.