Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706817›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Classification of contrast-enhanced ultrasonograms in rectal cancer according to tumor inhomogeneity using machine learning-based texture analysis.

Yuan Luo, Lang-Kuan Qin, Jing-Wen Yan, Hao Yin, Hua Zhuang, Jie-Ying Zhao, Yu-Ting Wu, Zi-Qiang Wang, Xin Wang, Dong-Quan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuan Luo *Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lang-Kuan Qin *School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jing-Wen YanDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao YinSchool of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hua ZhuangDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie-Ying ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yu-Ting WuDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zi-Qiang WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dong-Quan LiuSchool of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inhomogeneity within tumors can reflect tumor angiogenesis. Existing research into the quantization of angiogenesis mainly focuses on time-intensity curve parameters but has produced inconsistent results. In clinical work, it is difficult to achieve standardization and consistency for manual judgement of the inhomogeneity of contrast-enhanced images, while the artificial intelligence technology may be helpful. The aim of this study was to assess whether computers can assist in the artificial classification of tumor inhomogeneity in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images of rectal cancer. Methods: A total of 500 contrast-enhanced ultrasonograms were retrospectively collected, which was verified of rectal cancer pathologically from 2016 to 2018 as training set. All images are from 18-80 years old patients with rectal cancer in our hospital. These tumors are usually located in the middle and lower segment of the rectum, which can be completely observed on ultrasound. The images were divided into 3 categories according to the inhomogeneous distribution of contrast agents inside the tumors. Computing methods were used to simulate manual classification. Computer processing steps included segmentation, gray level quantization, dimension reduction, and classification. The results of 6 different gray level quantization, 2 dimensionality reduction methods, and 3 classifiers were compared, from which the optimal parameters were selected in each step. The performance of computer classification was evaluated using manual classification results as the reference. Ninety-seven ultrasonograms of contrast-enhanced rectal tumors were collected as validation set from 2018.1 to 2018.6. Results: The optimal gray level was set at 32. Principal component analysis (PCA) was the first choice for dimensionality reduction. The best classifier was support vector machines (SVM). The accuracy of computer classification was 87.80% (439/500). The accuracy of computer classification in the validation cohort was 60.82%. The area under the curve (AUC) of class 1, 2, and 3 were 0.76, 0.41, and 0.48, respectively. Conclusions: Results showed that the computer methods are competent for classifying inhomogeneity of contrast-enhanced rectal cancers inside ultrasonograms.

Indexed as

contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)inhomogeneitymachine learningtexture analysisUltrasonograms

Identifiers

PMID35706817
PMCPMC9189163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.