ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
Texture analysis based on PI-RADS 4/5-scored magnetic resonance images combined with machine learning to distinguish benign lesions from prostate cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the role of harmonization on clinically significant prostate cancer detection using MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Value of Texture Analysis of Multi-parameter MRI Images in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Lesions of O-RADS MRI 4 Lesions.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Radiomic Pipelines for Prostate Cancer in External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Review of Methods and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram incorporating multi-parametric MRI and hematological indicators for discriminating benign from malignant central prostatic nodules: a retrospective analysis.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Article
- Development trends and knowledge framework in the application of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 1984 to 2022.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer (PCa) increase sharply every year. Early diagnosis is essential; it determines survival and outcome. So, this study extracted the texture features of apparent diffusion coefficient images in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and built machine learning models based on radiomics texture analysis (TA) to determine its ability to distinguish benign from PCa lesions using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4/5 score. Methods: We enrolled 103 patients who underwent mp-MRI examinations and transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance fusion imaging (TRUS-MRI) targeted prostate biopsy and obtained pathological confirmation at our hospital from August 2017 to January 2020. We used ImageJ software to obtain texture feature parameters based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images, then standardized texture feature parameters, and used LASSO regression to reduce multiple feature parameters; 70% of the cases were randomly selected from the PCa group and the benign prostate hyperplasia group as the training set. The remaining 30% was used as the test set. The machine learning classification model for identifying benign and malignant prostate lesions was constructed using the feature parameters after dimensionality reduction. The clinical indicators were statistically analyzed, and we constructed a machine learning classification model based on clinical indicators of benign and malignant prostate lesions. Finally, we compared the model's performance based on radiomics texture features and clinical indicators to identify benign and malignant prostate lesions in PI-RADS 4/5 score. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the R-logistic model test set was 0.838, higher than the R-SVM and R-AdaBoost classification models. At this time, the corresponding R-logistic classification model formula is as follow: Y_radiomics=9.396-7.464*median ADC-0.584*kurtosis+0.627*skewness+0.576*MRI lesions volume; analysis of clinical indicators shows that the corresponding C-logistic classification model formula is as follows: Y_clinical =-2.608+0.324*PSA-3.045*Fib+4.147*LDL-C, the AUC value of the model training set was 0.860, smaller than the training set R-logistic classification model AUC value of 0.936. Conclusions: Radiomics combined with the machine learning classifier model has strong classification performance in identifying benign and PCa in PI-RADS 4/5 score. Various treatments and outcomes for PCa patients can be applied clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.